Parental justice and the kids pay view

Magnusson, Erik

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-018-9937-z

Parental justice and the kids pay view

Citation

Magnusson E. Parental justice and the kids pay view. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 2018 Aug;21(4):963-77. DOI: 10.1007/s10677-018-9937-z

Abstract

In a just society, who should be liable for the significant costs associated with creating and raising children? Patrick Tomlin has recently argued that children themselves may be liable on the grounds that they benefit from being raised into independent adults. This view, which Tomlin calls ‘Kids Pay’, depends on the more general principle that a beneficiary can incur an obligation to share in the cost of an essential benefit that the benefactor is responsible for her requiring. I argue in this paper that this principle is both generally false and particularly suspect in the kinds of cases that Tomlin needs it to be true, namely, cases in which a benefactor has created the need to be benefitted to satisfy a self-regarding interest in providing the benefit. In a nutshell, I argue that because parents (a) electively put their children into a needy circumstance for the purpose of (b) satisfying a self-regarding interest in meeting their children’s needs, they lack a legitimate claim against their children to share in its associated costs.