Departament de Dret
Documents de recerca, en accés obert, com ara articles de revista, llibres, comunicacions, ponències o posters a jornades i congressos, etc., del Departament de Dret de la UPF.
URI permanent per a aquesta comunitat http://hdl.handle.net/10230/5543
Navigate
Browse
Recent Submissions
Item type: Item , The Green Transition will be just - Or it won't succeed(Elsevier, 2026) Prainsack, Barbara; Neves, Maria Patrão ; Sahlin, Nils-Eric ; Biller-Andorno, Nikola; van den Hoven, Jeroen; Laukyte, Migle; Luków, Paweł; Molnar-Gabor, Fruzsina; Murphy, Thérèse; Sharon, Tamar; Vidalis, Takis; Kritikos, MihalisThe European Commission defines the Green Transition as the transformation set out in the European Green Deal. Ensuring that this transition is just is both an ethical requirement and a practical condition for maintaining public support and policy effectiveness. This Perspective proposes a multidimensional framework for assessing justice in Green Transition policies, encompassing distributional, procedural, recognitional, corrective, and transitional dimensions. Considering these dimensions in conjunction helps identify where justice claims converge and where genuine policy trade-offs arise, which should be made transparent and addressed through public deliberation. It sheds light on additional justice considerations which tend to get overlooked in many policy debates that focus predominantly on distributional justice concerns. Moreover, its multidimensionality is helpful in overcoming zero-sum framings which often present impediments for embedding justice throughout the policy cycle.Item type: Item , Constitutional accountability in the platform age: a three-dimensional framework for algorithmic governance(Cornell Law School, 2026) Lucchi, NicolaAlgorithmic governance increasingly shapes how information circulates, how norms are enforced, and how democratic decisions are made. Yet consti-tutional theory lacks the tools to conceptualize accountability in this new en-vironment, where private digital platforms exercise public-like powers with limited oversight. This Article develops a new framework for digital constitu-tional accountability, structured around three dimensions: epistemic (who con-trols knowledge and visibility), normative (who sets and enforces behavioral standards), and systemic (which institutions ensure constitutional review and democratic legitimacy). Unlike prior models focused solely on transparency or ethics, this approach integrates comparative jurisprudence, regulatory theory, and institutional design. Through case studies and constitutional decisions from the EU, United States, and United Kingdom, the Article shows how platform power disrupts traditional mechanisms of accountability, and how courts, reg-ulators, and lawmakers are beginning to respond. It concludes by proposing a reform agenda grounded in constitutional law, aimed at reasserting public over-sight over privatized digital infrastructures.Item type: Item , The impact of Google AI summaries and Google AI overviews on publishers' revenue and media freedom: implications for the information ecosystem and democratic resilience in the European Union(Publications Office of the European Union, 2026) Directorate-General for Citizens’ Rights, Justice and Institutional Affairs; Lucchi, NicolaItem type: Item , ¿Imponer o mantener? Consideraciones en torno al nuevo delito de imposición o mantenimiento de condiciones ilegales mediante fórmulas ajenas al contrato de trabajo(UNED. Facultad de Derecho, 2024) Alabau Pereiro, PauEntre la multitud de reformas penales que han visto la luz a lo largo de 2022, la introducción de un nuevo delito contra los derechos de los trabajadores puede haber pasado inadvertida. El nuevo artículo 311.2º CP, bautizado como delito de imposición o mantenimiento de condiciones ilegales mediante fórmulas ajenas al contrato de trabajo, presenta no pocos interrogantes a la luz del principio de intervención mínima y ofrece una enrevesada y deficiente redacción que anticipa serias dificultades en su aplicación judicial. Ante esta situación, el presente trabajo pretende, desde una perspectiva crítica, plantear los aspectos controvertidos de dicha figura para, a continuación, ofrecer una serie de criterios interpretativos que permitan alcanzar una solución dogmática mente coherente y político-criminalmente respetuosa con los principios irrenunciables que rigen en nuestro Derecho penal.Item type: Item , El estado actual del estado de derecho en América Latina. Algunas notas sobre el Informe bridge watch(Universidad del Rosario. Facultad de Jurisprudencia, 2026) Matarrita Arroyo, MarioEn la jerga marítima en inglés, un bridge watch (guardia de puente en castellano) es aquella persona tripulante de una embarcación -o su turno- encargada con la vigilancia (watch) del punto de mando del navío, comúnmente llamado puente (bridge) de mando. Se trata, entonces, de quien supervisa y controla el centro de navegación del barco con el fin elemental de garantizar su seguridad.