On the property analysis of opaque complements
| dc.contributor.author | Van Geenhoven, Veerle | ca |
| dc.contributor.author | McNally, Louise, 1965- | ca |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-03-03T13:38:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-03-03T13:38:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | ca |
| dc.description.abstract | In this paper, we regard Zimmermann’s/n(1993) property analysis of verbs of absence as a/nspecial case of the/nindependent ability of verbs to take property-type complements (see Ladusaw, 1994)./nBy integrating into this analysis a Quinian decomposition/nof verbs of absence we can tease apart the/ndistinction between opaque and/ntransparent, nonspecific complements, as well as the distinction between/nde dicto and de re readings of/nnonspecific complements. This prevents us from overgeneralizing/ntransparent readings of inherently opaque complements and/ninherently opaque verbs and it helps us to/nanswer some criticisms that Moltmann (1997) raises against Zimmermann’s proposal. | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | ca |
| dc.identifier.citation | Van Geerhoven V, Mcnally L. On the property analysis of opaque complements. Lingua. 2005;115(6):885-914. | ca |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0024-3841 | ca |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10230/23157 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | ca |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | ca |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Lingua. 2005;115(6):885-914. | |
| dc.rights | © Elsevier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.01.012 | ca |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | ca |
| dc.subject.keyword | Intensionality | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Nonspecificity | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Opacity | |
| dc.subject.other | GramĂ tica comparada i general -- Verb | |
| dc.subject.other | SemĂ ntica comparada | |
| dc.title | On the property analysis of opaque complements | ca |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | ca |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | ca |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
