Revisiting harmless discrimination

Mostra el registre complet Registre parcial de l'ítem

• dc.contributor.author Parr, Tom
• dc.date.accessioned 2021-11-30T07:47:00Z
• dc.date.available 2021-11-30T07:47:00Z
• dc.date.issued 2019
• dc.description.abstract In a co-authored piece with Adam Slavny, I argued that any promising account of the wrongness of discrimination must focus not only on the harmful outcomes of discriminatory acts but also on the deliberation of the discriminator and in particular on the reasons that motivate or fail to motivate her action. In this brief paper, I defend this conclusion against an objection that has recently been pressed against our view by Richard Arneson. This task is important not only because Arneson’s objection is an intriguing one, but also -- and more importantly -- because my response sheds further light on the content and structure of an attractive theory of wrongful discrimination, as well as on more fundamental ideas in moral philosophy.
• dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
• dc.identifier.citation Parr T. Revisiting harmless discrimination. Philosophia. 2019 Nov;47(5):1535-38. DOI: 10.1007/s11406-018-0052-0
• dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-0052-0
• dc.identifier.issn 0048-3893
• dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/49095
• dc.language.iso eng
• dc.publisher Springer
• dc.relation.ispartof Philosophia. 2019 Nov;47(5):1535-38
• dc.rights © Springer The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-0052-0.
• dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
• dc.subject.keyword Discrimination
• dc.subject.keyword Richard Arneson
• dc.subject.keyword Harm
• dc.subject.keyword Intentions
• dc.title Revisiting harmless discrimination
• dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
• dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion