Is our mental grammar just a set of constructions?

Mostra el registre complet Registre parcial de l'ítem

  • dc.contributor.author Hinzen, Wolfram
  • dc.date.accessioned 2019-10-21T08:48:06Z
  • dc.date.available 2019-10-21T08:48:06Z
  • dc.date.issued 2016
  • dc.description.abstract According to this book, ‘each of us carries around in our heads a “mental grammar” far more impressive than any written grammar’ (6); this grammar is made up of ‘abstract rules’ that can generate a ‘seemingly infinite number of novel sentences’ (12).
  • dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
  • dc.identifier.citation Hinzen W. Is our mental grammar just a set of constructions? Commentary on Evans 2014. Language. 2017; 92(1):203-7. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2016.0021
  • dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0021
  • dc.identifier.issn 0097-8507
  • dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/42475
  • dc.language.iso eng
  • dc.publisher Linguistic Society of America
  • dc.relation.ispartof Language. 2017; 92(1):203-7. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2016.0021
  • dc.rights © Linguistic Society of America
  • dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
  • dc.subject.other Evans, Vyvyan. The language myth: Why language is not an instinct -- Ressenyes
  • dc.title Is our mental grammar just a set of constructions?
  • dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
  • dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion