NOMA-2000 vs. PD-NOMA: an outage probability comparison
Mostra el registre complet Registre parcial de l'ítem
- dc.contributor.author Coşandal, Ismail
- dc.contributor.author Koca, Mutlu
- dc.contributor.author Biglieri, Ezio
- dc.contributor.author Sari, Hikmet
- dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-18T10:57:51Z
- dc.date.available 2021-05-18T10:57:51Z
- dc.date.issued 2020
- dc.description.abstract Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) is an emerging technique promising to accommodate the increasing data rate requirements of next generation networks. In power-domain (PD) NOMA, this challenge is addressed by allocating two or more users on each orthogonal resource block while assigning significantly different power levels to all users. Recently, an interesting alternative to conventional PD-NOMA has been NOMA-2000 where multiple access is done using two sets of orthogonal waveforms. In this letter we make a comparison of these two NOMA schemes based on their outage probabilities where the analytical expressions are derived without any simplifying assumption about the statistical dependencies caused by the presence of more than one user signal in each resource block. These derivations are validated by computer simulation results, which appear in tight agreement with the analysis and corroborate the claim that NOMA-2000 may significantly outperform PD-NOMA under realistic channel conditions and with different overload factors.
- dc.description.sponsorship I. Coşandal and M. Koca are with the Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bogazic¸i University, Bebek 34342 Istanbul, Turkey, Their research was supported by TUBITAK with the project 119N154. E. Biglieri is with the Departament TIC, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08008 Barcelona, Spain. His work was supported by the H2020 Framework Programme/ERC grant 694974.
- dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
- dc.identifier.citation Coşandal I, Koca M, Biglieri E, Sari H. NOMA-2000 vs. PD-NOMA: an outage probability comparison. IEEE Commun Lett. 2020;25(2):427-31. DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2020.3033727
- dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2020.3033727
- dc.identifier.issn 1089-7798
- dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/47581
- dc.language.iso eng
- dc.publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- dc.relation.ispartof IEEE Communications Letters. 2020;25(2):427-31
- dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/694974
- dc.rights © 2020 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2020.3033727
- dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
- dc.subject.keyword Non-orthogonal multiple access
- dc.subject.keyword Outage probability
- dc.subject.keyword Performance evaluation
- dc.title NOMA-2000 vs. PD-NOMA: an outage probability comparison
- dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
- dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion