La configuració del datiu en la llengua alemanya : judici d’acceptabilitat amb datius alemanys
Loading...
Date
Document Type
Document Version
Author
License
Citation
Marí Breunig, P. La configuració del datiu en la llengua alemanya : judici d’acceptabilitat amb datius alemanys. 2025. handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10230/71006
This citation was generated automatically.
Abstract
Tradicionalmente, muchos linguistas han considerado los casos gramaticales como un mecanismo sintactico que carece de contenido semántico. No obstante, su evolución y distribución en él discurso nos hacen pensar que sı que existen cimientos semánticos para estas categorías. El ́óbjetivo de la primera parte del trabajo es analizar las aportaciones semanticas del caso dativo en ́la lengua alemana para determinar su comportamiento, expresion y aportación semántica. Para ́abordar esta tarea, hemos realizado un analisis basado en corpus que explora los diferentes usos ́del dativo y tambien su mutabilidad en otras estructuras formales. También es conocido que ́los hablantes de herencia de aleman y de otras lenguas que presentan un sistema de casos grámaticales suelen hacer muchos errores de habla en relacion con estas marcas morfológicas. No obstante, se han investigado otros aspectos de la lengua. Estos estudios sugieren que las competencias interna y externa de estos hablantes no son necesariamente paralelas. En base a estos estudios, en la segunda parte de este trabajo proponemos que los hablantes de herencia sı que són capaces de discernir los usos adecuados de las marcas de caso como hacen los hablantes nativos monolingues. En contraste, creemos que estos hablantes pueden presentar interferencias en ̈relacion a la mutabilidad de los diferentes dativos analizados en la primera parte del trabajo. Para ́explorar estos comportamientos, hemos llevado a cabo un experimento con hablantes de aleman ́nativos, de herencia y de lengua extranjera. Hemos distribuido una tarea de juicio de aceptabilidad con estımulos auditivos en el que ped ́ ıamos a los participantes que valoraran el grado en ́que cada estımulo les parecía aceptable. Cada estímulo conten ́ ıa un dativo expresado o bien con ́una marca morfologica, un pronombre personal, un sintagma preposicional o bien una marca ́de caso inadecuada. Los resultados del experimento confirman los hallazgos del analisis de la ́primera parte en relacion con la mutabilidad de los dativos con varias estructuras en funció de ́su contenido semantico. En contraste, no hemos podido confirmar que los hablantes de herencia sepan distinguir los usos adequados de los inadequados de las marcas morfologicas de caso. ́Los resultados sugieren que depende de su nivel. A modo de conclusion, podemos afirmar que ́el caso dativo tiene un contenido semantico definido que ha ido cambiando con la evolución ́de la lengua pero que ha mantenido un significado central constante. Ası mismo, los datos del ́
experimento apoyan que los hallazgos del analisis puesto que el papel sem ́ antico interpretado ́por cada dativo determina su mutabilidad en otras estructuras formales.
Traditionally, many linguists have considered grammatical cases as an asemantic syntactic mechanism. However, their evolution and distribution in the language suggest that there might be semantic foundations for these categories. In the first part of this study we will analyze the semantic contributions of the dative case in the German language in order to determine its behavior, formal expression and semantic contribution. To carry out this task we have conducted a corpus-based analysis that explores different uses of the dative and also its mutability to other formal structures. It is also known that heritage speakers of German and other languages with a grammatical case system tend to produce errors in speech regarding these morphological marks. However, other aspects of the language have been researched and it has been found that the internal and external competence of these speakers is not necessarily parallel. Based on the literature, in the second part of this study we propose that heritage speakers are able to discern the appropriate uses of morphological case markings as monolingual native speakers. In contrast, we believe that these speakers may experience interferences regarding the mutability of the different datives analyzed in the first part of the study. To explore these behaviors, we conducted an experiment with native speakers of German, heritage speakers, and learners of German as a foreign language. We have distributed an acceptability judgement task with auditory stimuli in which we asked participants to assess the degree to which each stimulus seemed appropriate. Each stimulus contained a dative expressed either with a morphological mark, a personal pronoun, a prepositional phrase, or an inadequate morphological case mark. The results confirm the findings of the analysis of the first part as to the mutability of dative arguments into various formal structures according to their semantic content. In contrast, heritage speakers of German only discriminated inadequate case markings when they had high self-reported competence. In conclusion, we can say that the dative case has a defined semantic content that has changed along with with the evolution of the language but that has kept a constant central meaning. Likewise, the data from the experiment support the findings of the analysis since the semantic role played by each dative determines its mutability in other formal structures.
Traditionally, many linguists have considered grammatical cases as an asemantic syntactic mechanism. However, their evolution and distribution in the language suggest that there might be semantic foundations for these categories. In the first part of this study we will analyze the semantic contributions of the dative case in the German language in order to determine its behavior, formal expression and semantic contribution. To carry out this task we have conducted a corpus-based analysis that explores different uses of the dative and also its mutability to other formal structures. It is also known that heritage speakers of German and other languages with a grammatical case system tend to produce errors in speech regarding these morphological marks. However, other aspects of the language have been researched and it has been found that the internal and external competence of these speakers is not necessarily parallel. Based on the literature, in the second part of this study we propose that heritage speakers are able to discern the appropriate uses of morphological case markings as monolingual native speakers. In contrast, we believe that these speakers may experience interferences regarding the mutability of the different datives analyzed in the first part of the study. To explore these behaviors, we conducted an experiment with native speakers of German, heritage speakers, and learners of German as a foreign language. We have distributed an acceptability judgement task with auditory stimuli in which we asked participants to assess the degree to which each stimulus seemed appropriate. Each stimulus contained a dative expressed either with a morphological mark, a personal pronoun, a prepositional phrase, or an inadequate morphological case mark. The results confirm the findings of the analysis of the first part as to the mutability of dative arguments into various formal structures according to their semantic content. In contrast, heritage speakers of German only discriminated inadequate case markings when they had high self-reported competence. In conclusion, we can say that the dative case has a defined semantic content that has changed along with with the evolution of the language but that has kept a constant central meaning. Likewise, the data from the experiment support the findings of the analysis since the semantic role played by each dative determines its mutability in other formal structures.
Other authors
Description
Tutora: Sílvia Perpiñan Hinarejos
Treball de fi de grau en Doble grau en Traducció i Interpretació i Llengües aplicades
