The definitions of three‐dimensional landmarks on the human face: an interdisciplinary view
Mostra el registre complet Registre parcial de l'ítem
- dc.contributor.author Katina, Stanislav
- dc.contributor.author McNeil, Kathryn
- dc.contributor.author Ayoub, Ashraf
- dc.contributor.author Guilfoyle, Brendan
- dc.contributor.author Khambay, Balvinder
- dc.contributor.author Siebert, Paul
- dc.contributor.author Sukno, Federico Mateo
- dc.contributor.author Rojas, Mario A.
- dc.contributor.author Vittert, Liberty
- dc.contributor.author Waddington, John L.
- dc.contributor.author Whelan, Paul F.
- dc.contributor.author Bowman, Adrian W.
- dc.date.accessioned 2024-01-29T07:22:00Z
- dc.date.available 2024-01-29T07:22:00Z
- dc.date.issued 2016
- dc.description.abstract The analysis of shape is a key part of anatomical research and in the large majority of cases landmarks provide a standard starting point. However, while the technology of image capture has developed rapidly and in particular three-dimensional imaging is widely available, the definitions of anatomical landmarks remain rooted in their two-dimensional origins. In the important case of the human face, standard definitions often require careful orientation of the subject. This paper considers the definitions of facial landmarks from an interdisciplinary perspective, including biological and clinical motivations, issues associated with imaging and subsequent analysis, and the mathematical definition of surface shape using differential geometry. This last perspective provides a route to definitions of landmarks based on surface curvature, often making use of ridge and valley curves, which is genuinely three-dimensional and is independent of orientation. Specific definitions based on curvature are proposed. These are evaluated, along with traditional definitions, in a study that uses a hierarchical (random effects) model to estimate the error variation that is present at several different levels within the image capture process. The estimates of variation at these different levels are of interest in their own right but, in addition, evidence is provided that variation is reduced at the observer level when the new landmark definitions are used.
- dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
- dc.identifier.citation Katina S, McNeil K, Ayoub A, Guilfoyle B, Khambay B, Siebert P, et al. The definitions of three‐dimensional landmarks on the human face: an interdisciplinary view. Journal of Anatomy. 2016 Mar;228(3):355-65. DOI: 10.1111/joa.12407
- dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.12407
- dc.identifier.issn 0021-8782
- dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/58850
- dc.language.iso eng
- dc.publisher Wiley
- dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Anatomy. 2016 Mar;228(3):355-65
- dc.rights © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Anatomy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Anatomical Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
- dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- dc.subject.keyword Curves
- dc.subject.keyword Landmarks
- dc.subject.keyword Reproducibility
- dc.subject.keyword Shape
- dc.title The definitions of three‐dimensional landmarks on the human face: an interdisciplinary view
- dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
- dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion