Paying to Break the Rules: Compensation, Restitution and the Strategic Foul

Mostra el registre complet Registre parcial de l'ítem

• dc.contributor.author Imbrišević, Miroslav
• dc.date.accessioned 2024-10-17T08:57:11Z
• dc.date.available 2024-10-17T08:57:11Z
• dc.date.issued 2020
• dc.date.modified 2020-11-01T10:53:32Z
• dc.description.abstract Some philosophers of sport have suggested that strategic fouling is acceptable if you pay full compensation. In this paper I will argue that the idea of ‘compensation’ is conceptually inadequate to deal with strategic fouling. Compensation is a legal remedy designed to make the victim of a wrong whole again, i.e. make good the loss or harm they have suffered. But compensation as the analogon between law and games is ill-conceived when applied to strategic fouling. I will suggest another analogon from the law of obligations – restitution – which is more apt to deal with strategic fouling and which shows more clearly why the ‘compensation’ prescribed by the rules often fails to restore the fouled side.
• dc.format application/pdf
• dc.identifier http://www.raco.cat/index.php/FairPlay/article/view/375514
• dc.identifier 2014-9255
• dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/62722
• dc.publisher Universitat Pompeu Fabra
• dc.relation.haspart FairPlay, Revista de Filosofia, Ética y Derecho del Deporte, 2020, Núm. 18 (2020), p. 44-72
• dc.relation.haspart FairPlay, Revista de Filosofia, Ética y Derecho del Deporte, 2020, Núm. 18 (2020), p. 44-72
• dc.relation.haspart http://www.raco.cat/index.php/FairPlay/article/view/375514/468929
• dc.rights.uri info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
• dc.source.uri RACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert)
• dc.title Paying to Break the Rules: Compensation, Restitution and the Strategic Foul
• dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
• dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion