Pragmatic constraints do not prevent the co-activation of alternative names: evidence from sequential naming tasks with one and two speakers
Mostra el registre complet Registre parcial de l'ítem
- dc.contributor.author Mädebach, Andreas
- dc.contributor.author Kurtz, Franziska
- dc.contributor.author Schriefers, Herbert
- dc.contributor.author Jescheniak, Jörg D.
- dc.date.accessioned 2021-03-23T08:22:21Z
- dc.date.available 2021-03-23T08:22:21Z
- dc.date.issued 2020
- dc.description.abstract We investigated whether the phonological co-activation of alternative names in picture naming (e.g. “fish” for target “shark”) is reduced by contextual constraints which render them inappropriate. In the constraining context, the target naming response was preceded by a naming response to an object from the same category (e.g. an eel) which remained visible during target naming. Therefore, use of the alternative target name “fish” would result (a) in an ambiguous response because of the visual context and (b) in a pragmatically odd response because of the previous naming response. In Experiment 1 the context pictures were named by the participants themselves and in Experiment 2 by a communication partner. In both experiments, interference from distractor words phonologically related (“finger”) versus unrelated (“book”) to the alternative name was observed regardless of context. This finding indicates limited flexibility in lexical activation during speech planning.
- dc.description.sponsorship Our research was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG JE229/11-1). Andreas Mädebach was supported by a Beatriu de Pinós postdoctoral grant (2017 BP 00180) of the Catalan Government during the writing of this manuscript. We thank Tobias Struck and Ismail Ayoub for assistance in data collection.
- dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
- dc.identifier.citation Mädebach A, Kurtz F, Schriefers H, Jescheniak JD. Pragmatic constraints do not prevent the co-activation of alternative names: evidence from sequential naming tasks with one and two speakers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 2020 Feb 10;35(8):1073-88. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2020.1727539
- dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1727539
- dc.identifier.issn 2327-3798
- dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/46893
- dc.language.iso eng
- dc.publisher Taylor & Francis
- dc.relation.ispartof Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 2020 Feb 10;35(8):1073-88
- dc.relation.isreferencedby https://osf.io/gh7n6/
- dc.rights © This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in LANGUAGE, COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE on 2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/23273798.2020.1727539
- dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
- dc.subject.keyword Speech production
- dc.subject.keyword Lexical access
- dc.subject.keyword Picture-word interference
- dc.subject.keyword Context effects
- dc.subject.keyword Joint naming
- dc.title Pragmatic constraints do not prevent the co-activation of alternative names: evidence from sequential naming tasks with one and two speakers
- dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
- dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion