India’s ‘silent contestation’ of the EU’s perspective on local ownership

Klossek, Lara

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33238-9_5

India’s ‘silent contestation’ of the EU’s perspective on local ownership

License

Citation

Klossek L. India’s ‘silent contestation’ of the EU’s perspective on local ownership. In: Johansson-Nogués E, Vlaskamp M, Barbé E, editors. European Union contested: norm research in international relations. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 75-93. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-33238-9_5

Abstract

Local ownership has become a central theme in today’s discourse on peacebuilding, with the EU being very vocal in embracing the norm. On the surface, it thus seems that the EU is supported in its perspective on local ownership by the international community at large. Looking more closely at the discourse surrounding peacebuilding practices, it becomes however apparent, that local ownership remains contested, particularly among emerging countries such as India. The chapter, therefore, sets out to explore why and how India is contesting the EU on local ownership, and how far this impacts the legitimacy of the EU’s norm. Using document analysis on India and the EU’s speeches at the UN, as well as policy documents outlining their peacebuilding strategies, the chapter finds that while India is critical of the content of the norm and the degree of its institutionalization, it chooses more indirect modes of contestation, such as ‘silent contestation’. As a result, the European Union has not been receptive to India’s critique. This is amplified, as the EU has developed its perspective on local ownership among like-minded countries, within the OECD-DAC context and hence relies on internal legitimization of the norm.