A review of constructivist learning methods with supporting tooling in ict higher education: Defining different types of scaffolding

dc.contributor.authorMelero Gallardo, Javierca
dc.contributor.authorHernández Leo, Daviniaca
dc.contributor.authorBlat, Josepca
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-14T11:45:22Z
dc.date.available2016-04-14T11:45:22Z
dc.date.issued2012ca
dc.description.abstractInformation and Communication Technology (ICT) engineering education is facing/na decreasing interest by students. To deal with this issue, a need for shifting from traditional/nlearning approaches to constructivist methods has been identified. Several pedagogical/nmethodologies based on social and constructivist theories are being applied to engage students/nin ICT education. This paper presents a literature review of studies carried out from 2000 to/n2010 that have applied constructivist learning methods with supportive tools to specific ICT/nareas. From the analysis of the literature review this paper identifies the most representative/nconstructivist learning methods within the field of ICT education. In particular, we pay/nattention to the educational tooling used to support the learning process and the learning/nbenefits of applying such methods. The analysis also reveals that different combinations of/nguidance approaches and tooling implementations are often adopted to scaffold the learning/nprocess. With the aim of understanding to what extent and how scaffolding is present in the/nstudied learning scenarios, this document proposes a definition of different types of scaffolding/ntechniques. Namely: social-guidance and system-guidance scaffolding, depending on whether/nan individual or a tool is the responsible for providing support to students; macro-scaffolding/nwhen pedagogical methods define activity flows, or micro-scaffolding when the support is/nprovided to perform specific actions within activities; and tool-enveloped scaffolding, when a/ngeneric tool such a learning management system scaffolds the learning process by the/nintegration of different supportive tools, and tool-embedded scaffolding when the scaffolding is/napplied within a specific-purpose tooling.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research has been partially funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and/nInnovation in the Learn3 project (TIN2008-05163/TSI) and the EEE Project/n(TIN2011-28308-C03-03).
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfca
dc.identifier.citationMelero J, Hernández-Leo D, Blat J. A review of constructivist learning methods with supporting tooling in ICT higher education: Defining different types of scaffolding. J Univers. Comput Sci. 2012;18(16):2334-2360 DOI:10.3217/jucs-018-16-2334ca
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3217/jucs-018-16-2334
dc.identifier.issn0948-695Xca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/26089
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherGraz University of Technology. Institut für Informationssysteme und Computer Medien (IICM)ca
dc.relation.ispartofJ Univers. Comput Sci. 2012;18((16):2334-2360.
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/3PN/TIN2008-05163
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/3PN/TIN2011-28308-C03-03
dc.rights© J.UCSca
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca
dc.subject.keywordLiterature Reviewen
dc.subject.keywordICT engineering educationen
dc.subject.keywordTeaching and learning strategiesen
dc.subject.keywordConstructivismen
dc.subject.keywordScaffoldingen
dc.titleA review of constructivist learning methods with supporting tooling in ict higher education: Defining different types of scaffoldingca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Melero_JUCS18_ARev-1.pdf
Size:
203.74 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format