dc.contributor.author |
Andrzejak, Ralph Gregor |
dc.contributor.author |
Kraskov, Alexander |
dc.contributor.author |
Stögbauer, Harald |
dc.contributor.author |
Mormann, Florian |
dc.contributor.author |
Kreuz, Thomas |
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-02-18T13:54:32Z |
dc.date.available |
2020-02-18T13:54:32Z |
dc.date.issued |
2003 |
dc.identifier.citation |
Andrzejak RG, Kraskov A, Stogbauer H, Mormann F, Kreuz T. Bivariate surrogate techniques: necessity, strengths, and caveats. Phys Rev E. 2003;68:066202. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.066202 |
dc.identifier.issn |
2470-0045 |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/43634 |
dc.description.abstract |
The concept of surrogates allows testing results from time series analysis against specified null hypotheses. In application to bivariate model dynamics we here compare different types of surrogates, each designed to test against a different null hypothesis, e.g., an underlying bivariate linear stochastic process. Two measures that aim at a characterization of interdependence between nonlinear deterministic dynamics were used as discriminating statistics. We analyze eight different stochastic and deterministic models not only to demonstrate the power of the surrogates, but also to reveal some pitfalls and limitations. |
dc.description.sponsorship |
T.K. and F.M. acknowledge support from the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft. |
dc.format.mimetype |
application/pdf |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
dc.publisher |
American Physical Society |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Physical Review E. 2003;68:066202 |
dc.title |
Bivariate surrogate techniques: necessity, strengths, and caveats |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.identifier.doi |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.066202 |
dc.subject.keyword |
Nonlinear signal analysis |
dc.subject.keyword |
Synchronization |
dc.subject.keyword |
Surrogates |
dc.rights.accessRights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.type.version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |