Welcome to the UPF Digital Repository

Some topics in health economics that become distorted clichés for health policy

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author López i Casasnovas, Guillem
dc.contributor.author Meneu, Ricardo
dc.date.accessioned 2018-03-22T10:06:14Z
dc.date.available 2018-03-22T10:06:14Z
dc.date.issued 2017-10
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/34240
dc.description.abstract The purpose of this paper is to pick up some of the best known clichés that surround the translation of the equivalent topics in health economics into health policy. These topics used to be distorted due to the inertia of the past, as a sort of some repetaed classic mantra (C), to the lack of a proper understanding by some of the health care agents in the policy and management fields (L) and some others result from ideological prejudices and the distortion relates to malevolence (M). We have selected a bunch of them according to our forty years’ experience in crossing the bridge from health economics to health policy and vice versa.
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries Health Policy Papers; 9 bis (2017)
dc.rights This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properlyattributed.
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.title Some topics in health economics that become distorted clichés for health policy
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper
dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

In collaboration with Compliant to Partaking