Some topics in health economics that become distorted clichés for health policy

dc.contributor.authorLópez i Casasnovas, Guillemca
dc.contributor.authorMeneu, Ricardoca
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-22T10:06:14Z
dc.date.available2018-03-22T10:06:14Z
dc.date.issued2017-10
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to pick up some of the best known clichés that surround the translation of the equivalent topics in health economics into health policy. These topics used to be distorted due to the inertia of the past, as a sort of some repetaed classic mantra (C), to the lack of a proper understanding by some of the health care agents in the policy and management fields (L) and some others result from ideological prejudices and the distortion relates to malevolence (M). We have selected a bunch of them according to our forty years’ experience in crossing the bridge from health economics to health policy and vice versa.ca
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/34240
dc.language.isoengca
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHealth Policy Papers; 9 bis (2017)
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properlyattributed.ca
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ca
dc.titleSome topics in health economics that become distorted clichés for health policyca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperca

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
HPP09bis2017.pdf
Size:
410.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License

Rights