The vascular surgeon facing clinical ethical dilemmas (the VASCUETHICS Study): 'V'-shaped association between compassionate attitudes and professional seniority

Mostra el registre complet Registre parcial de l'ítem

• dc.contributor.author Clará Velasco, Alberto
• dc.date.accessioned 2025-12-03T14:11:44Z
• dc.date.available 2025-12-03T14:11:44Z
• dc.date.issued 2006
• dc.date.updated 2025-12-03T14:11:44Z
• dc.description.abstract Objective: To evaluate the association between compassionate attitudes and seniority in vascular surgeons facing clinical ethical dilemmas (CED). Subjects and methods: (1) DESIGN: Cross-sectional. (2) SUBJECTS: Vascular surgeons (residents included) from the 28 vascular teaching departments of one European country. (3) MEASUREMENTS: Multidisciplinary team-designed, structured and self-administered questionnaire consisting of five clinical ethical dilemmas, of which four had conflict between compassion towards a 'small' or 'very costly' beneficial action vs. a reasonable but more 'pragmatic' allocation of health resources. Participants stated their degree of agreement with eight answers representing the two attitudes on a continuous scale. (4) STATISTICS: Cluster analysis and logistic regression model adjusted by confounding factors. Results: Two hundred and fifty three vascular surgeons (median age 37 years, 74% male) from the 26 participating teaching vascular departments (public hospitals) completed the questionnaire (88% surgeons/department). Cluster analysis identified two groups of surgeons according to their pattern of answers: Group I (n=63) were mainly compassionate whereas Group II (n=180) were mainly pragmatic. The multivariate analysis disclosed, after adjusting for additional private practice, on call services and career status, a significant V-shaped relationship between the compassionate behaviour and seniority. Surgeons with 8-15 years experience were the least compassionate. Conclusions: The youngest and the most senior vascular surgeons were more prone to favour compassionate attitudes when facing clinical ethical dilemmas. Although both compassionate and pragmatic attitudes may be legitimate ethically, physicians not favouring compassion may be at risk of leaving the patient without an advocate within the health care system.
• dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
• dc.identifier.citation Clará A, Merino J, Mateos E, Ysa A, Román B, Vidal-Barraquer F, Vascuethics Study Group. The vascular surgeon facing clinical ethical dilemmas (the VASCUETHICS Study): 'V'-shaped association between compassionate attitudes and professional seniority. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 Jun;31(6):594-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.11.011
• dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.11.011
• dc.identifier.issn 1078-5884
• dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/72115
• dc.language.iso eng
• dc.publisher Elsevier
• dc.relation.ispartof European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2006;31(6):594-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.11.011
• dc.rights © Elsevier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.11.011
• dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
• dc.subject.keyword Bioethics
• dc.subject.keyword Medical ethics
• dc.subject.keyword Compassion
• dc.subject.keyword Professionalism
• dc.subject.keyword Vascular surgery
• dc.subject.keyword Surgeon
• dc.subject.keyword Ethical dilemma
• dc.subject.keyword Resource allocation
• dc.title The vascular surgeon facing clinical ethical dilemmas (the VASCUETHICS Study): 'V'-shaped association between compassionate attitudes and professional seniority
• dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
• dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion