Harder governance built on soft foundations: experience fromOECD peer reviews

Mostra el registre complet Registre parcial de l'ítem

• dc.contributor.author Lehtonen, Markku
• dc.date.accessioned 2024-06-13T06:24:47Z
• dc.date.available 2024-06-13T06:24:47Z
• dc.date.issued 2020
• dc.description.abstract The OECD international peer reviews represent a typical example of ‘harder soft governance’ at the international level. Lacking direct regulatory power, the Organisation exerts its influence via soft persuasion through peer pressure, entailing attention from the media, civil society, and other member country governments. Drawing on interviews and documentary material from the period 1996 to 2017, and participant observation from 1996 to 2005, this article examines the implementation of various measures of ‘hardening’ in three OECD peer reviews: the Environmental Performance Reviews and Economic Surveys carried out by the OECD proper, and the Energy Policy Reviews of the OECD International Energy Agency. The three reviews differ along the different dimensions of hardness, yet none of the reviews can be unambiguously classified as the hardest. The article highlights the multiple trade-offs between different types of hardening, as well as between hardness and softness. Hardening is not an end in itself and does not necessarily equate with greater impact. Greater attention should be paid to the directionality and multiple pathways of review influence, the roles of reviews in the service of socialisation, norm-creation and policy advocacy, and the essential function of soft elements as a foundation for hardening.
• dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
• dc.identifier.citation Lehtonen M. Harder governance built on soft foundations: experience fromOECD peer reviews. J Environ Policy Plan. 2020;22(6):814-29. DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2020.1793746
• dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2020.1793746
• dc.identifier.issn 1523-908X
• dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60461
• dc.language.iso eng
• dc.publisher Taylor & Francis
• dc.rights © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis GroupThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is notaltered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
• dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
• dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
• dc.subject.keyword Energy policy
• dc.subject.keyword Peer pressure
• dc.subject.keyword International organisations
• dc.subject.keyword Soft governance
• dc.subject.keyword International peer review
• dc.title Harder governance built on soft foundations: experience fromOECD peer reviews
• dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
• dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion