COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study
Mostra el registre complet Registre parcial de l'ítem
- dc.contributor.author Terwee, Caroline B.
- dc.contributor.author Prinsen, Cecilia A.C.
- dc.contributor.author Chiarotto, A.
- dc.contributor.author Westerman, M. J.
- dc.contributor.author Patrick, Donald L.
- dc.contributor.author Alonso Caballero, Jordi
- dc.contributor.author Bouter, Lex M.
- dc.contributor.author De Vet, Henrica C. W.
- dc.contributor.author Mokkink, Lidwine B.
- dc.date.accessioned 2018-11-16T08:33:40Z
- dc.date.available 2018-11-16T08:33:40Z
- dc.date.issued 2018
- dc.description.abstract Background: Content validity is the most important measurement property of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) and the most challenging to assess. Our aims were to: (1) develop standards for evaluating the quality of PROM development; (2) update the original COSMIN standards for assessing the quality of content validity studies of PROMs; (3) develop criteria for what constitutes good content validity of PROMs, and (4) develop a rating system for summarizing the evidence on a PROM’s content validity and grading the quality of the evidence in systematic reviews of PROMs. Methods: An online 4-round Delphi study was performed among 159 experts from 21 countries. Panelists rated the degree to which they (dis)agreed to proposed standards, criteria, and rating issues on 5-point rating scales (‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’), and provided arguments for their ratings. Results: Discussion focused on sample size requirements, recording and field notes, transcribing cognitive interviews, and data coding. After four rounds, the required 67% consensus was reached on all standards, criteria, and rating issues. After pilot-testing, the steering committee made some final changes. Ten criteria for good content validity were defined regarding item relevance, appropriateness of response options and recall period, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of the PROM. Discussion: The consensus-based COSMIN methodology for content validity is more detailed, standardized, and transparent than earlier published guidelines, including the previous COSMIN standards. This methodology can contribute to the selection and use of high-quality PROMs in research and clinical practice.
- dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
- dc.identifier.citation Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, Westerman MJ, Patrick DL, Alonso J et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1159-70. DOI 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0
- dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0
- dc.identifier.issn 0962-9343
- dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/35773
- dc.language.iso eng
- dc.publisher Springer
- dc.relation.ispartof Quality of Life Research. 2018;27(5):1159-70
- dc.rights © The Author(s) 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
- dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- dc.subject.keyword Patient outcome assessment
- dc.subject.keyword Validation studies
- dc.subject.keyword Content validity
- dc.subject.keyword Patient-reported outcome
- dc.subject.keyword COSMIN
- dc.subject.keyword Systematic review
- dc.title COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study
- dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
- dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion