Nature prescribing or nature programming? Complementary practices to increase time in nature to support mental health

Tate, Wesley; Chawla, Louise; Lavelle Sachs, Ashby; Litt, Jill; Razani, Nooshin

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/eco.2023.0064

Nature prescribing or nature programming? Complementary practices to increase time in nature to support mental health

License

Citation

Tate W, Chawla L, Lavelle Sachs A, Litt JS, Razani N. Nature prescribing or nature programming? Complementary practices to increase time in nature to support mental health. Ecopsychology. 2024;16(4):288-301. DOI: 10.1089/eco.2023.0064

Abstract

There is extensive evidence that when people have parks, gardens, and greenery near their homes, they gain mental and physical health benefits. As a result, there are a number of health care initiatives to motivate people to spend time in local green spaces. This article proposes a network of access and engagement with nature to support health and well-being: Equitable access to nearby nature spaces; nature prescriptions to encourage people to integrate time in nature into their lives; and nature programming that involves people in organized activities in nature to address health challenges. This article defines nature prescribing and nature programming and provides examples of each, with an emphasis on initiatives that support mental health. It compares these approaches according to four criteria: Participant engagement, program leadership and community partnerships, the role of health care providers, and financial sustainability. Considering nature prescribing and programming in this ordered way can help identify strategies to increase time in nature, which are compatible with health system resources and participant needs. The article closes by considering implications for practice and research.