Immigration, identity, and anonymity: intentionally masked intolerance in Ireland

Creighton, Mathew J.; Fahey, Éamonn; McGinnity, Frances

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01979183211054806

Immigration, identity, and anonymity: intentionally masked intolerance in Ireland

License

Citation

Creighton MJ, Fahey É, McGinnity F. Immigration, identity, and anonymity: intentionally masked intolerance in Ireland. Int Migr Rev. 2022;56(3):881-910. DOI: 10.1177/01979183211054806

Abstract

Newcomers to Ireland confront a context of reception shaped by large-scale historical emigration and more recent immigration defined by an increasingly diverse set of origin contexts, both within and outside the European Union (EU). How has the Irish population responded to these groups, and how openly do Irish residents express their views toward different immigrant groups? We test this response using a survey experiment, which offered respondents an anonymous way to express any negative attitudes to immigrant groups they may have had. Results from the survey experiment show that Irish residents’ support for Black and Polish immigrations is overstated when expressed directly. In contrast, their sentiment toward Muslim immigrants is notably insensitive to the level of anonymity provided, indicating little difference between overt and covert expression of support (or antipathy). In other words, when race/ethnicity or EU origin is made salient, Irish respondents are more likely to mask negative sentiment. When Islam is emphasized, however, Irish antipathy is not masked. We find that in-group preferences, instead of determining support in an absolute sense, shape the reluctance with which opposition to immigrant groups is overtly expressed.