COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
Mostra el registre complet Registre parcial de l'ítem
- dc.contributor.author Mokkink, Lidwine B.ca
- dc.contributor.author De Vet, Henrica C. W.ca
- dc.contributor.author Prinsen, Cecilia A.C.ca
- dc.contributor.author Patrick, Donald L.ca
- dc.contributor.author Alonso Caballero, Jordica
- dc.contributor.author Bouter, Lex M.ca
- dc.contributor.author Terwee, Caroline B.ca
- dc.date.accessioned 2018-03-22T08:44:01Z
- dc.date.available 2018-03-22T08:44:01Z
- dc.date.issued 2018
- dc.description.abstract PURPOSE: The original COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was developed to assess the methodological quality of single studies on measurement properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Now it is our aim to adapt the COSMIN checklist and its four-point rating system into a version exclusively for use in systematic reviews of PROMs, aiming to assess risk of bias of studies on measurement properties. METHODS: For each standard (i.e., a design requirement or preferred statistical method), it was discussed within the COSMIN steering committee if and how it should be adapted. The adapted checklist was pilot-tested to strengthen content validity in a systematic review on the quality of PROMs for patients with hand osteoarthritis. RESULTS: Most important changes were the reordering of the measurement properties to be assessed in a systematic review of PROMs; the deletion of standards that concerned reporting issues and standards that not necessarily lead to biased results; the integration of standards on general requirements for studies on item response theory with standards for specific measurement properties; the recommendation to the review team to specify hypotheses for construct validity and responsiveness in advance, and subsequently the removal of the standards about formulating hypotheses; and the change in the labels of the four-point rating system. CONCLUSIONS: The COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist was developed exclusively for use in systematic reviews of PROMs to distinguish this application from other purposes of assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties, such as guidance for designing or reporting a study on the measurement properties.
- dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
- dc.identifier.citation Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(5):1171-1179. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
- dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
- dc.identifier.issn 0962-9343
- dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/34235
- dc.language.iso eng
- dc.publisher Springerca
- dc.relation.ispartof Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(5):1171-1179
- dc.rights © The Author(s) 2017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
- dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- dc.subject.keyword Measurement properties
- dc.subject.keyword Outcome measurement instruments
- dc.subject.keyword Quality assessment
- dc.subject.keyword Risk of bias
- dc.subject.keyword Systematic review
- dc.title COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measuresca
- dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
- dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion