Validity and applicability of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in patients hospitalized for acute medical conditions

Mostra el registre complet Registre parcial de l'ítem

• dc.contributor.author Fontane Francia, Laia
• dc.contributor.author Reig, Maria Helena
• dc.contributor.author Garcia-Ribera, Sonika
• dc.contributor.author Herranz, Miriam
• dc.contributor.author Miracle, Mar
• dc.contributor.author Chillarón Jordan, Juan José
• dc.contributor.author Estepa, Araceli
• dc.contributor.author Toro, Silvia
• dc.contributor.author Ballesta, Silvia
• dc.contributor.author Navarro, Humberto
• dc.contributor.author Llauradó Cabot, Gemma
• dc.contributor.author Pedro-Botet, Juan Carlos
• dc.contributor.author Benaiges Foix, David
• dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-22T08:15:52Z
• dc.date.available 2024-03-22T08:15:52Z
• dc.date.issued 2023
• dc.description.abstract (1) Background: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the concurrent and predictive validity and the applicability of the global leadership initiative on malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in patients hospitalized for acute medical conditions. (2) Methods: prospective cohort study with patients hospitalized for acute medical conditions. For validation, the methodology proposed by the GLIM group of experts was used. Sensitivity and specificity values greater than 80% with respect to those for the subjective global assessment (SGA) were necessary for concurrent validation. The time necessary to complete each nutritional assessment test was determined. (3) Results: A total of 119 patients were evaluated. The SGA was applied to the entire cohort, but the GLIM criteria could not be applied to 3.4% of the patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the GLIM criteria with respect to those for the SGA to detect malnutrition were 78.0 and 86.2%, respectively. The GLIM predictive validity criterion was fulfilled because patients with malnutrition more frequently had a hospital stay >10 days (odds ratio of 2.98 (1.21-7.60)). The GLIM criteria required significantly more time for completion than did the SGA (p = 0.006). (4) Conclusion: The results of this study do not support the use of the GLIM criteria over the SGA for the diagnosis of malnutrition in patients hospitalized for acute medical conditions.
• dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
• dc.identifier.citation Fontane L, Reig MH, Garcia-Ribera S, Herranz M, Miracle M, Chillaron JJ, et al. Validity and applicability of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in patients hospitalized for acute medical conditions. Nutrients. 2023 Sep 16;15(18):4012. DOI: 10.3390/nu15184012
• dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15184012
• dc.identifier.issn 2072-6643
• dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/59519
• dc.language.iso eng
• dc.publisher MDPI
• dc.relation.ispartof Nutrients. 2023 Sep 16;15(18):4012
• dc.rights © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
• dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
• dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• dc.subject.keyword Applicability
• dc.subject.keyword Global leadership initiative on malnutrition
• dc.subject.keyword Hospitalized patients
• dc.subject.keyword Length of stay
• dc.subject.keyword Malnutrition
• dc.subject.keyword Nutrition assessment
• dc.title Validity and applicability of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in patients hospitalized for acute medical conditions
• dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
• dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion