Stress testing the Centiloid: Precision and variability of PET quantification of amyloid pathology

Mostra el registre complet Registre parcial de l'ítem

  • dc.contributor.author Shekari, Mahnaz
  • dc.contributor.author Vállez García, David
  • dc.contributor.author Collij, Lyduine E.
  • dc.contributor.author Altomare, Daniele
  • dc.contributor.author Heeman, Fiona
  • dc.contributor.author Pemberton, Hugh G.
  • dc.contributor.author Roé Vellvé, Núria
  • dc.contributor.author Bullich, Santiago
  • dc.contributor.author Buckley, Christopher, 1948-
  • dc.contributor.author Stephens, Andrew W.
  • dc.contributor.author Farrar, Gill
  • dc.contributor.author Frisoni, Giovanni B.
  • dc.contributor.author Klunk, William E.
  • dc.contributor.author Barkhof, Frederik
  • dc.contributor.author Gispert López, Juan Domingo
  • dc.contributor.author ADNI
  • dc.contributor.author AMYPAD Consortium
  • dc.contributor.author Context of use
  • dc.contributor.author Diagnosis
  • dc.contributor.author Disease‐modifying therapies
  • dc.contributor.author Image harmonization
  • dc.contributor.author Radiotracers
  • dc.contributor.author White matter
  • dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-18T06:16:56Z
  • dc.date.available 2025-02-18T06:16:56Z
  • dc.date.issued 2024
  • dc.description.abstract Introduction: Assessing the potential sources of bias and variability of the Centiloid (CL) scale is fundamental for its appropriate clinical application. Methods: We included 533 participants from AMYloid imaging to Prevent Alzheimer's Disease (AMYPAD DPMS) and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohorts. Thirty-two CL pipelines were created using different combinations of reference region (RR), RR and target types, and quantification spaces. Generalized estimating equations stratified by amyloid positivity were used to assess the impact of the quantification pipeline, radiotracer, age, brain atrophy, and harmonization status on CL. Results: RR selection and RR type impact CL the most, particularly in amyloid-negative individuals. The standard CL pipeline with the whole cerebellum as RR is robust against brain atrophy and differences in image resolution, with 95% confidence intervals below ± 3.95 CL for amyloid beta positivity cutoffs (CL < 24). Discussion: The standard CL pipeline is recommended for most scenarios. Confidence intervals should be considered when operationalizing CL cutoffs in clinical and research settings. Highlights: We developed a framework for evaluating Centiloid (CL) variability to different factors. Reference region selection and delineation had the highest impact on CL values. Whole cerebellum (WCB) and whole cerebellum plus brainstem (WCB+BSTM) as reference regions yielded consistent results across tracers. The standard CL pipeline is robust against atrophy and image resolution variation. Estimated within- and between-pipeline variability (95% confidence interval) in absolute CL units.
  • dc.description.sponsorship The authors acknowledge all data donors and collaborators involved in AMYPAD and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) studies. This research would not have been possible without the time and dedication of every participant included in these studies. “AMYPAD project leading to this application has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No. 115952. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program and EFPIA.” This communication reflects the views of the authors and neither the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) nor the European Union and EFPIA are liable for any use that may be made of the information contained herein.
  • dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
  • dc.identifier.citation Shekari M, Vállez García D, Collij LE, Altomare D, Heeman F, Pemberton H, et al. Stress testing the Centiloid: Precision and variability of PET quantification of amyloid pathology. Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Aug;20(8):5102-13. DOI: 10.1002/alz.13883
  • dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.13883
  • dc.identifier.issn 1552-5260
  • dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/69623
  • dc.language.iso eng
  • dc.publisher Wiley
  • dc.relation.ispartof Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Aug;20(8):5102-13
  • dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/115952
  • dc.rights © The Author(s). Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
  • dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
  • dc.subject.keyword Alzheimer's disease
  • dc.subject.keyword Age
  • dc.subject.keyword Amyloid PET accuracy
  • dc.subject.keyword Biomarker validation
  • dc.subject.keyword Brain atrophy
  • dc.subject.keyword Clinical applications
  • dc.subject.keyword Clinical trials
  • dc.title Stress testing the Centiloid: Precision and variability of PET quantification of amyloid pathology
  • dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
  • dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion