Limonene and linalool hydroperoxides review: Pros and cons for routine patch testing

dc.contributor.authorOgueta, Isabel A.
dc.contributor.authorBrared Christensson, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorGiménez-Arnau, Elena
dc.contributor.authorBrans, Richard
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, Mark
dc.contributor.authorStingeni, Luca
dc.contributor.authorFoti, Caterina
dc.contributor.authorAerts, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorSvedman, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorGonçalo, Margarida
dc.contributor.authorGiménez Arnau, Anna Maria
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-14T06:04:55Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractLimonene and linalool are among the most common fragrance terpenes used in everyday products. They are pre-haptens, forming hydroperoxides (Lim-OOHs, Lin-OOHs) upon oxidation and inducing frequent positive patch test reactions in patients with dermatitis, and yet they are not routinely tested in Europe. This review evaluates current patch testing with Lim-OOHs and Lin-OOHs by asking whether hydroperoxide patch testing is warranted, examining the difficulties or challenges related to reading and interpreting hydroperoxide patch test results with currently available material, and assessing their relevance. Studies are increasingly pointing to high percentages of positive reactions in patients consecutively patch tested with these oxidized products. An association between a positive clinical history and a strong patch test reaction has been described, but problems with doubtful/irritant reactions have also been reported. Considering the high frequency of relevant positive reactions, the incorporation of Lim-OOHs 0.3% and Lin-OOHs 1% in the baseline series may be justified. Since exposure, sensitization, and elicitation limits of Lim-OOHs and Lin-OOHs in the products still need to be better determined, an assessment of previous exposure, possible sensitizations, and reactions may help to improve the clinical assessment.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationOgueta IA, Brared Christensson J, Giménez-Arnau E, Brans R, Wilkinson M, Stingeni L, Foti C, Aerts O, Svedman C, Gonçalo M, Giménez-Arnau A. Limonene and linalool hydroperoxides review: Pros and cons for routine patch testing. Contact Dermatitis. 2022 Jul;87(1):1-2. DOI: 10.1111/cod.14064
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.14064
dc.identifier.issn0105-1873
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/54393
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofContact Dermatitis. 2022 Jul;87(1):1-2
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Ogueta IA, Brared Christensson J, Giménez-Arnau E, Brans R, Wilkinson M, Stingeni L, Foti C, Aerts O, Svedman C, Gonçalo M, Giménez-Arnau A. Limonene and linalool hydroperoxides review: Pros and cons for routine patch testing. Contact Dermatitis. 2022 Jul;87(1):1-2. DOI: 10.1111/cod.14064, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.14064. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.keywordAllergic contact dermatitis
dc.subject.keywordHydroperoxides
dc.subject.keywordLimonene
dc.subject.keywordLinalool
dc.subject.keywordPatch test
dc.titleLimonene and linalool hydroperoxides review: Pros and cons for routine patch testing
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ogueta_cd_limo.pdf
Size:
280.45 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format