Reclaiming party politics research: response to Anika Gauja and Karina Kosiara-Pedersen: 2021: decline, adaptation and relevance: political parties and their researchers in the twentieth century: European Political Science 20(1):123–38

Mostra el registre complet Registre parcial de l'ítem

• dc.contributor.author Kenny, Meryl
• dc.contributor.author Bjarnegård, Elin
• dc.contributor.author Lovenduski, Joni
• dc.contributor.author Childs, Sarah
• dc.contributor.author Evans, Elizabeth
• dc.contributor.author Verge Mestre, Tània
• dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-03T11:23:35Z
• dc.date.available 2024-05-03T11:23:35Z
• dc.date.issued 2022
• dc.description.abstract In a 2021 Special Issue in European Political Science, Anika Gauja and Karina Kosiara-Pedersen review the sub-field of party politics research. In doing so, they argue party politics scholarship reflects the broader development of the political science discipline, illustrating the evolving relationship between politics researchers and the organisations they study. In this reply, we argue that the party politics sub-field reflects the wider discipline in another crucial respect—it continues to marginalise gender politics scholarship. We demonstrate that a gendered lens fundamentally transforms key questions in the field around what party politics scholars study, and how and why they conduct their research, with relevant consequences for whose work is included. In failing to engage with this scholarship, “mainstream” party politics scholars are (re)producing unequal power relations and hierarchies within the discipline, while also depriving themselves of the capacity to address fully key questions of representation, democracy, continuity and change.
• dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
• dc.identifier.citation Kenny M, Bjarnegård E, Lovenduski J, Childs S, Evans E, Verge T. Reclaiming party politics research. Response to Anika Gauja and Karina Kosiara-Pedersen: 2021: decline, adaptation and relevance: political parties and their researchers in the twentieth century: European Political Science 20(1):123–38. Eur Polit Sci. 2022;21(2):274-91. DOI: 10.1057/s41304-022-00362-0
• dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41304-022-00362-0
• dc.identifier.issn 1680-4333
• dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/59996
• dc.language.iso eng
• dc.publisher Springer
• dc.relation.ispartof European political science. 2022;21(2):274-91
• dc.rights This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41304-022-00362-0
• dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
• dc.subject.keyword Political parties
• dc.subject.keyword Gender politics
• dc.subject.keyword Feminist institutionalism
• dc.subject.keyword Political science
• dc.subject.keyword Power
• dc.subject.keyword Representation
• dc.title Reclaiming party politics research: response to Anika Gauja and Karina Kosiara-Pedersen: 2021: decline, adaptation and relevance: political parties and their researchers in the twentieth century: European Political Science 20(1):123–38
• dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
• dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion