Uncertainty assessment of proarrhythmia predictions derived from multi-level in silico models

Kopańska, Karolina; Rodríguez-Belenguer, Pablo; Llopis-Lorente, Jordi; Trenor, Beatriz; Saiz, Javier; Pastor Maeso, Manuel

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03557-6

Uncertainty assessment of proarrhythmia predictions derived from multi-level in silico models

License

Citation

Kopańska K, Rodríguez-Belenguer P, Llopis-Lorente J, Trenor B, Saiz J, Pastor M. Uncertainty assessment of proarrhythmia predictions derived from multi-level in silico models. Arch Toxicol. 2023 Oct;97(10):2721-40. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-023-03557-6

Abstract

In silico methods can be used for an early assessment of arrhythmogenic properties of drug candidates. However, their use for decision-making is conditioned by the possibility to estimate the predictions' uncertainty. This work describes our efforts to develop uncertainty quantification methods for the predictions produced by multi-level proarrhythmia models. In silico models used in this field usually start with experimental or predicted IC50 values that describe drug-induced ion channel blockade. Using such inputs, an electrophysiological model computes how the ion channel inhibition, exerted by a drug in a certain concentration, translates to an altered shape and duration of the action potential in cardiac cells, which can be represented as arrhythmogenic risk biomarkers such as the APD90. Using this framework, we identify the main sources of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties and propose a method based on probabilistic simulations that replaces single-point estimates predicted using multiple input values, including the IC50s and the electrophysiological parameters, by distributions of values. Two selected variability types associated with these inputs are then propagated through the multi-level model to estimate their impact on the uncertainty levels in the output, expressed by means of intervals. The proposed approach yields single predictions of arrhythmogenic risk biomarkers together with value intervals, providing a more comprehensive and realistic description of drug effects on a human population. The methodology was tested by predicting arrhythmogenic biomarkers on a series of twelve well-characterised marketed drugs, belonging to different arrhythmogenic risk classes.