Assessing quality of life in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic and standardized comparison of available instruments
Mostra el registre complet Registre parcial de l'ítem
- dc.contributor.author Schmidt, Stefanie, 1979-ca
- dc.contributor.author Garin Boronat, Olatz, 1979-ca
- dc.contributor.author Pardo Cladellas, Yolandaca
- dc.contributor.author Valderas Martínez, José Maríaca
- dc.contributor.author Alonso Caballero, Jordica
- dc.contributor.author Rebollo, Pabloca
- dc.contributor.author Rajmil Rajmil, Luis Albertoca
- dc.contributor.author García Forero, Carlosca
- dc.contributor.author Ferrer Forés, Maria Montserratca
- dc.contributor.author EMPRO Groupca
- dc.date.accessioned 2015-06-18T07:03:32Z
- dc.date.available 2015-06-18T07:03:32Z
- dc.date.issued 2014ca
- dc.description.abstract Purpose: The objective was to obtain a standardized evaluation of available prostate cancer-specific quality of life instruments used in patients with early-stage disease. Methods: We carried out systematic literature reviews in the PubMed database to identify manuscripts which contained information regarding either the development process or metric properties of prostate cancer-specific quality of life instruments. Each instrument was evaluated by two experts, independently, using the Evaluating Measures of Patient-Reported Outcomes (EMPRO) tool. An overall and seven attribute-specific EMPRO scores were calculated (range 0–100, worst to best): measurement model, reliability, validity, responsiveness, interpretability, burden and alternative forms. Results: Eight instruments and 57 manuscripts (2–15 per instrument) were identified. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) was the best rated (overall EMPRO score 83.1 points). Good results were also obtained by University of California Los Angeles-Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI), Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale (PORPUS) and Prostate Cancer Quality of Life Instrument (PC-QoL) with 77.3, 70.5 and 64.8 points, respectively. These four instruments passed with distinction the validity and responsiveness evaluation. Insufficient reliability results were observed for UCLA-PCI and PORPUS. Conclusions: Current evidence supports the choice of EPIC, PORPUS or PC-QoL. Attribute-specific EMPRO results facilitate selecting the adequate instrument for every purpose. For longitudinal studies or clinical trials, where responsiveness is the priority, EPIC or PC-QoL should be considered. We recommend the PORPUS for economic evaluations because it allows cost-utility analysis, and EPIC short versions to minimize administration burden.en
- dc.description.sponsorship This study was supported by grants from AGAUR (2012FI_B1 00177; 2009 SGR 1095), Instituto Carlos III FEDER (PS09/02139) and RecerCAIXA (2010ACUP 00158)en
- dc.format.mimetype application/pdfca
- dc.identifier.citation Schmidt S, Garin O, Pardo Y, Valderas JM, Alonso J, Rebollo P et al. Assessing quality of life in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic and standardized comparison of available instruments. Quality of Life Research. 2014;23(8):2169-81. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0678-8ca
- dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0678-8
- dc.identifier.issn 0962-9343ca
- dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/23854
- dc.language.iso engca
- dc.publisher SpringerOpenca
- dc.relation.ispartof Quality of Life Research. 2014;23(8):2169-81
- dc.rights © The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.comca
- dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca
- dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- dc.subject.keyword Prostatic neoplasmsen
- dc.subject.keyword Quality of lifeen
- dc.subject.keyword Patient outcomesen
- dc.subject.keyword Psychometricsen
- dc.subject.keyword Validation studiesen
- dc.subject.other Qualitat de vidaca
- dc.subject.other Psicometriaca
- dc.title Assessing quality of life in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic and standardized comparison of available instrumentsen
- dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
- dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca