dc.contributor.author |
Hernández, Gonzalo |
dc.contributor.author |
Masclans Enviz, Joan Ramon |
dc.contributor.author |
Castellvi, Andrea |
dc.contributor.author |
Marin Corral, Judith |
dc.contributor.author |
Roca, Oriol |
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-01-11T06:48:40Z |
dc.date.issued |
2022 |
dc.identifier.citation |
Hernandez G, Ramos FJ, Añon JM, Ortiz R, Colinas L, Masclans JR et al. Early tracheostomy for managing ICU capacity during the COVID-19 outbreak: A propensity-matched cohort study. Chest. 2022;161(1):121-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.015 |
dc.identifier.issn |
0012-3692 |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/52181 |
dc.description.abstract |
Background: During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, shortages of ventilators and ICU beds overwhelmed health care systems. Whether early tracheostomy reduces the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay is controversial. Research question: Can failure-free day outcomes focused on ICU resources help to decide the optimal timing of tracheostomy in overburdened health care systems during viral epidemics? Study design and methods: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who had undergone tracheostomy in 15 Spanish ICUs during the surge, when ICU occupancy modified clinician criteria to perform tracheostomy in Patients with COVID-19. We compared ventilator-free days at 28 and 60 days and ICU- and hospital bed-free days at 28 and 60 days in propensity score-matched cohorts who underwent tracheostomy at different timings (≤ 7 days, 8-10 days, and 11-14 days after intubation). Results: Of 1,939 patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia, 682 (35.2%) underwent tracheostomy, 382 (56%) within 14 days. Earlier tracheostomy was associated with more ventilator-free days at 28 days (≤ 7 days vs > 7 days [116 patients included in the analysis]: median, 9 days [interquartile range (IQR), 0-15 days] vs 3 days [IQR, 0-7 days]; difference between groups, 4.5 days; 95% CI, 2.3-6.7 days; 8-10 days vs > 10 days [222 patients analyzed]: 6 days [IQR, 0-10 days] vs 0 days [IQR, 0-6 days]; difference, 3.1 days; 95% CI, 1.7-4.5 days; 11-14 days vs > 14 days [318 patients analyzed]: 4 days [IQR, 0-9 days] vs 0 days [IQR, 0-2 days]; difference, 3 days; 95% CI, 2.1-3.9 days). Except hospital bed-free days at 28 days, all other end points were better with early tracheostomy. Interpretation: Optimal timing of tracheostomy may improve patient outcomes and may alleviate ICU capacity strain during the COVID-19 pandemic without increasing mortality. Tracheostomy within the first work on a ventilator in particular may improve ICU availability. |
dc.format.mimetype |
application/pdf |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Chest. 2022;161(1):121-9 |
dc.rights |
© Elsevier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.015 |
dc.title |
Early tracheostomy for managing ICU capacity during the COVID-19 outbreak: A propensity-matched cohort study |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.identifier.doi |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.015 |
dc.subject.keyword |
Capacity |
dc.subject.keyword |
Failure-free |
dc.subject.keyword |
Resource |
dc.subject.keyword |
Timing |
dc.subject.keyword |
Tracheostomy |
dc.rights.accessRights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.type.version |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |