Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24 (2), 202-222, March 2011
Abstract
Although research has documented the importance of emotion in risk perception, little is known
about its prevalence in everyday life. Using the Experience Sampling Method, 94 part-time
students were prompted at random via cellular telephones to report on mood state and three
emotions and to assess risk on thirty occasions during their working hours. The emotions
valence, arousal, and dominance were measured using self-assessment manikins (Bradley &
Lang, 1994). Hierarchical linear models (HLM) revealed that mood state and emotions explained
significant variance in risk perception. In addition, valence and arousal accounted for variance
over and above reason (measured by severity and possibility of risks). Six risks were reassessed
in a post-experimental session and found to be lower than their real-time counterparts.
The study demonstrates the feasibility and value of collecting representative samples of data with
simple technology. Evidence for the statistical consistency of the HLM estimates is provided in
an Appendix.
Other authors
Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Departament d'Economia i Empresa
Description
Collection
Economics and Business Working Papers Series; 1108