Evaluating group fairness in online tutoring rankings

dc.contributor.authorRando Ramírez, Javier
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T11:18:20Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T11:18:20Z
dc.date.issued2021-06
dc.descriptionTutors: Carlos Castillo i Emilia Gómezca
dc.description.abstractThis project addresss the evaluation of group fairness in commercial search engines that may lead to discrimination against certain groups of individuals. More precisely, we measure fairness with respect to gender and nationality in a set of platforms where users can search for second language teachers completely online. These websites must rank available teachers for visitors, and disparate exposure may lead to uneven economic benefit. We evaluate if teachers belonging to protected groups are fairly represented in the first positions of the rankings, and we conduct a statistical analysis of price depending on nationality and gender across languages and platforms. Our results put forward that although most lists are fair for all groups, there are some worrisome exceptions. Finally, we found out that women and people from high-income countries charge significantly higher fees for their classes.ca
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf*
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/48884
dc.language.isoengca
dc.rights© Tots els drets reservatsca
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca
dc.subject.keywordAlgorithmic fairnessen
dc.subject.keywordRanking biasen
dc.subject.keywordData miningen
dc.subject.keywordInformation retrievalen
dc.subject.keywordMachine learningen
dc.subject.keywordLanguage tutoringen
dc.titleEvaluating group fairness in online tutoring rankingsca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisca

Files