Credit demand versus supply channels : experimental- and administrative-based evidence

dc.contributor.authorMichelangeli, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorPeydró, José-Luis
dc.contributor.authorSette, Enrico
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-12T13:17:03Z
dc.date.available2021-02-12T13:17:03Z
dc.date.issued2021-07
dc.description.abstract(July 2020) This paper identifies and quantifies –for the first time– the relative importance of borrower (credit demand) versus bank (supply) balance-sheet channels. We submit fictitious applications (varying households’ characteristics) to the major Italian online-mortgage platform. In this way we ensure that all banks receive exactly the same mortgage applications, and that –for each application– there are other identical ones except for one borrower-level characteristic. We find that: (i) Borrower and bank channels are equally strong in causing (and explaining) loan acceptance (each channel changes acceptance by 50 p.p. for the interquartile range and explains 29% of R-square). (ii) Differently, for pricing, borrower factors are much stronger. (iii) Banks supplying less credit accept riskier borrowers. Finally –exploiting administrative credit register data– we document borrower-lender assortative matching: safer banks have more credit relations with safer firms. Moreover, the measure of credit supply estimated in the experiment (differently from a very similar measure estimated from the observational mortgage data) determines bank credit supply to firms and risk-taking in administrative data.en
dc.description.abstract(July 2021) We identify the relative importance for lending of borrower (demand) versus bank (supply) factors. We submit thousands of fictitious mortgage applications, changing one borrower-level factor at time, to the major Italian online mortgage platform. Each application goes to all banks. We find that borrower and bank factors are equally strong in causing and explaining loan acceptance. For pricing, borrower factors are instead stronger. Moreover, banks supplying less credit accept riskier borrowers. Exploiting the administrative credit register, we show borrower-lender assortative matching, and that the bank-level strength measure, estimated on the experimental data, determines credit supply and risk-taking to real firms.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf*
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/46467
dc.language.isoengca
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBarcelona GSE Working Paper;1192
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca
dc.subject.otherCredit demandca
dc.subject.otherCredit supplyca
dc.subject.otherBank lending channelca
dc.subject.otherHousehold balance sheet channelca
dc.subject.otherMortgagesca
dc.subject.otherSMEsca
dc.subject.otherRisk-takingca
dc.titleCredit demand versus supply channels : experimental- and administrative-based evidenceca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperca

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1731xWPInformes.pdf
Size:
1.38 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1731WPxInformesJuly 2021.pdf
Size:
1.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
July 2021