Is post-Marxism deconstructionist?

Abstract

This dissertation undertakes a comprehensive examination of the interplay between post-Marxism and deconstruction, shedding light on the profound influence Derrida had on Laclau and Mouffe, while also highlighting the innovative approach adopted by post-Marxism in relation to deconstruction. Positioned as a deconstructive operation within Marxism, post-Marxism strives to transcend the determinism inherent in traditional Marxist thought and enhance its political efficacy. The convergence of these two theoretical frameworks becomes evident through the striking resemblance between Laclau and Mouffe’s notion of "antagonism" and Derrida's concept of "differánce." Although they seemingly diverge in terms of deconstructive and articulatory practices, and deconstruction and decision, a thorough examination of Derrida's theories of hospitality and decision reveals a significant alignment with the perspective of Laclau and Mouffe. The dissimilarity between them can be attributed to their divergent political orientations: while Laclau and Mouffe’s work is primarily conceived as a partisan political intervention, Derrida remains situated within a more academically inclined and less politically ambitious realm. Consequently, it can be concluded that the disparity between deconstruction and post-Marxism does not stem from their content but rather from the external orientations imposed by their respective authors. By exploring these intricate connections and disparities, this dissertation contributes to a deeper understanding of the complex relationship between post-Marxism and deconstruction, shedding new light on their theoretical implications and political significance.