Mediterranean’s migration dilemma and the EU’s Readmission Agreements: reinforcing a centre-periphery relation

Mostra el registre complet Registre parcial de l'ítem

  • dc.contributor.author İçduygu, Ahmet
  • dc.contributor.author Demiryontar, Birce
  • dc.date.accessioned 2019-12-12T07:43:35Z
  • dc.date.available 2019-12-12T07:43:35Z
  • dc.date.issued 2019-12
  • dc.description.abstract The EU emphasis on externalisation of migration governance hinders cooperation in the Mediterranean and consolidates pre-existing power inequalities. The most controversial examples have emerged in the content and context of the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement and the EU-Turkey Joint Statement. By analysing the case of Turkey and adding comparative perspective through the cases of Morocco and Tunisia, this article argues that the EU policy instruments of externalisation consolidate an asymmetrical relationship in the long run. They shift the economic, social, political and normative burden of migration management and reinforce a centre-periphery relationship between the EU-Med and non-EU Med regions.ca
  • dc.format.mimetype application/pdf*
  • dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/43144
  • dc.language.iso engca
  • dc.relation.ispartofseries EuroMedMig Working Paper Series; 1 (2019)
  • dc.rights This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Licenseca
  • dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca
  • dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ca
  • dc.subject.keyword Mediterranean
  • dc.subject.keyword Migration
  • dc.subject.keyword Readmission
  • dc.subject.keyword EU
  • dc.subject.keyword Turkey
  • dc.title Mediterranean’s migration dilemma and the EU’s Readmission Agreements: reinforcing a centre-periphery relationca
  • dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperca