Do the contests with the largest prizes attract the most able contestants? To
what extent do contestants avoid competition? In this paper, we show, theoretically
and empirically, that the distribution of abilities plays a crucial role in determining
contest choice. Sorting exists only when the proportion of high-ability contestants
is sufficiently small. As this proportion increases, contestants shy away from competition
and sorting decreases, such that, reverse sorting becomes a possibility. ...
Do the contests with the largest prizes attract the most able contestants? To
what extent do contestants avoid competition? In this paper, we show, theoretically
and empirically, that the distribution of abilities plays a crucial role in determining
contest choice. Sorting exists only when the proportion of high-ability contestants
is sufficiently small. As this proportion increases, contestants shy away from competition
and sorting decreases, such that, reverse sorting becomes a possibility. We
test our theoretical predictions using a large panel data set containing contest choice
over three decades. We use exogenous variation in the participation of highly-able
competitors to provide empirical evidence for the relationship among prizes, competition,
and sorting.
+