Trujillo Guillén, MacarenaPrakash, PunitFaridi, PegahRadosevic, Aleksandar, 1974-Curto, SergioBurdío Pinilla, FernandoBerjano, Enrique J.2021-02-262021-02-262020Trujillo M, Prakash P, Faridi P, Radosevic A, Curto S, Burdio F, Berjano E. How large is the periablational zone after radiofrequency and microwave ablation? Computer-based comparative study of two currently used clinical devices. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020; 37(1):1131-8. DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.18230220265-6736http://hdl.handle.net/10230/46593Purpose: To compare the size of the coagulation (CZ) and periablational (PZ) zones created with two commercially available devices in clinical use for radiofrequency (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), respectively. Methods: Computer models were used to simulate RFA with a 3-cm Cool-tip applicator and MWA with an Amica-Gen applicator. The Arrhenius model was used to compute the damage index (Ω). CZ was considered when Ω > 4.6 (>99% of damaged cells). Regions with 0.6<Ω < 2.1 were considered as the PZ (tissue that has undergone moderate sub-ablative hyperthermia). The ratio of PZ volume to CZ volume (PZ/CZ) was regarded as a measure of performance, since a low value implies achieving a large CZ while keeping the PZ small. Results: Ten-min RFA (51 W) created smaller periablational zones than 10-min MWA (11.3 cm3 vs. 17.2-22.9 cm3, for 60-100 W MWA, respectively). Prolonging duration from 5 to 10 min increased the PZ in MWA more than in RFA (2.7 cm3 for RFA vs. 8.3-11.9 cm3 for 60-100 W MWA, respectively). PZ/CZ for RFA were relatively high (65-69%), regardless of ablation time, while those for MWA were highly dependent on the duration (increase of up to 25% between 5 and 10 min) and on the applied power (smaller values as power was raised, 102% for 60 W vs. 81% for 100 W, both for 10 min). The lowest PZ/CZ across all settings was 56%, obtained with 100 W-5 min MWA. Conclusions: Although RFA creates smaller periablational zones than MWA, 100 W-5 min MWA provides the lowest PZ/CZ.application/pdfeng© 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.How large is the periablational zone after radiofrequency and microwave ablation? Computer-based comparative study of two currently used clinical devicesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2020.1823022Microwave ablationModerate hyperthermic heatingPeriablational zoneRadiofrequency ablationThermal ablationTumor ablationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess