Delayed gastric emptying after classical whipple or pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: a randomized clinical trial (QUANUPAD)

Busquets, J.; Martín, S.; Secanella, Ll.; Sorribas, M.; Cornellà, Natalia; Altet Torné, Juan; Peláez, N.; Bajen, M.; Carnaval, T.; Videla, Sebastià; Fabregat, J.

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02583-9

Delayed gastric emptying after classical whipple or pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: a randomized clinical trial (QUANUPAD)

License

Citation

Busquets J, Martín S, Secanella L, Sorribas M, Cornellà N, Altet J, et al. Delayed gastric emptying after classical whipple or pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: a randomized clinical trial (QUANUPAD). Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Sep; 407(6): 2247-58. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02583-9

Abstract

Purpose: pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) has been the gold standard for pancreatic head lesion resection for several years. Some studies have noted that it involves more delayed gastric emptying (DGE) than classical Whipple (i.e., pancreatoduodenectomy with antrectomy). Our working hypothesis was that the classical Whipple has a lower incidence of DGE. We aimed to compare the incidence of DGE among pancreatoduodenectomy techniques. Methods: This pragmatic, randomized, open-label, single-center clinical trial involved patients who underwent classical Whipple (study group) or PPPD (control group). Gastric emptying was clinically evaluated using scintigraphy. DGE was defined according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) criteria. The secondary endpoints were postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, anthropometric measurements, and nutritional status. Results: a total of 84 patients were randomized (42 per group). DGE incidence was 50% (20/40, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 35-65%) in the study group and 62% (24/39, 95% CI: 46-75%) in the control group (p = 0.260). No differences were observed between both groups regarding postoperative morbidity or length of hospital stay. Anthropometric measurements at 6 months post-surgery: triceps fold measurements were 12 mm and 16 mm (p = 0.021). At 5 weeks post-surgery, triceps fold measurements were 13 mm and 16 mm (p = 0.020) and upper arm circumferences were 26 cm and 28 cm (p = 0.030). No significant differences were observed in nutritional status. Conclusion: DGE incidence and severity did not differ between classical Whipple and PPPD. Some anthropometric measurements may indicate a better recovery with PPPD.