Incidencia de la incapacidad temporal por contingencia común y profesional en la muestra continua de vidas laborales en 2009

Zaballa, Elena

Incidencia de la incapacidad temporal por contingencia común y profesional en la muestra continua de vidas laborales en 2009

Citation

Zaballa, E. Incidencia de la incapacidad temporal por contingencia común y profesional en la muestra continua de vidas laborales en 2009. 2013. handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10230/21299

This citation was generated automatically.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the incidence of work and non-work related sickness absence (SA) in 2009 in employees covered by Social Security system, which are included in the Continuous Working Life Survey./nMethods: Cohort study of 873,008 workers covered by Social Security system in Spain, with 163,008 SA episodes and a total of 675,923.6 workers-year at risk. The first episode incidence rate was estimate for all SA episodes and for musculoskeletal disorders by sociodemographic and occupational covariates. Subsequently, crude (RRc) and adjusted (RRa) rate ratios were calculated by a Poisson regression model./nResults: The incidence of work related and non-work related sickness absence was 23.1 and 1.0 cases per 100 workers-year, respectively. In non-work related SA, a higher incidence was found among women, workers aged under 25 and in Navarra (32.8 cases per 100 workers-year). In contrast men and Galicia showed higher incidence in work-related SA. By diagnostic category, musculoskeletal disorders had the highest incidence rate with 424.7 cases per 10,000 workers-year and 3.6 cases per 10,000 workers-year. Temporary employees had higher risk to develop a work related SA (RRa=1.09; IC95%=1.04-1.15) and non-work related SA (RRa=1.02; IC95%=1.01-1.03) than permanent employees./nConclusions: Our study showed the same pattern in the incidence of age, security system regimen and employment status. However we observed differences in the incidence for occupation, sex, company size, region and economic activity. It is necessary further research on the differences established by economic activity and employment status.