Pain management during office hysteroscopy: An evidence-based approach

Buzzaccarini, Giovanni; Pacheco, Luis Alonso; Vitagliano, Amerigo; Haimovich Segal, Sergio Mario; Chiantera, Vito; Török, Péter; Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni; Laganà, Antonio Simone; Carugno, Jose

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58081132

Pain management during office hysteroscopy: An evidence-based approach

License

Citation

Buzzaccarini G, Alonso Pacheco L, Vitagliano A, Haimovich S, Chiantera V, Török P, Vitale SG, Laganà AS, Carugno J. Pain management during office hysteroscopy: An evidence-based approach. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Aug 20;58(8):1132. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58081132

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Hysteroscopy is a reliable technique which is highly useful for the evaluation and management of intrauterine pathology. Recently, the widespread nature of in-office procedures without the need for anesthesia has been requesting validation of practical approach in order to reduce procedure-related pain. In this regard, we performed a comprehensive review of literature regarding pain management in office hysteroscopic procedures. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Methodology Register), Global Health, Health Technology Assessment Database and Web of Science, other research registers (for example Clinical Trials database) were searched. We searched for all original articles regarding pain relief strategy during office hysteroscopy, without date restriction. Results have been collected and recommendations have been summarized according to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) tool. Moreover, the strength of each recommendation was scored following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment (GRADE) system, in order to present the best available evidence. Results: Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for pain management are feasible and can be applied in office setting for hysteroscopic procedures. The selection of strategy should be modulated according to the characteristics of the patient and difficulty of the procedure. Conclusions: Accumulating evidence support the use of pharmacological and other pharmacological-free strategies for reducing pain during office hysteroscopy. Nevertheless, future research priorities should aim to identify the recommended approach (or combined approaches) according to the characteristics of the patient and difficulty of the procedure.