Response to Tsuda et al. “demonstrating the undermining of science and health policy after the Fukushima nuclear accident by applying the toolkit for detecting misused epidemiological methods”

Cléro, Enora; Demoury, Claire; Grosche, Bernd; Liutsko, Liudmila; Motreff, Yvon; Ohba, Takashi; Oughton, Deborah; Pirard, Philippe; Rogel, Agnès; Schneider, Thierry; Van Nieuwenhuyse, An; Laurier, Dominique; Cardis, Elisabeth

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-023-00966-z

Response to Tsuda et al. “demonstrating the undermining of science and health policy after the Fukushima nuclear accident by applying the toolkit for detecting misused epidemiological methods”

License

Citation

Cléro E, Demoury C, Grosche B, Liutsko L, Motreff Y, Ohba T, et al. Response to Tsuda et al. “demonstrating the undermining of science and health policy after the Fukushima nuclear accident by applying the toolkit for detecting misused epidemiological methods”. Environ Health. 2023 Feb 17;22(1):17. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-023-00966-z

Abstract

The SHAMISEN (Nuclear Emergency Situations - Improvement of Medical And Health Surveillance) European project was conducted in 2015-2017 to review the lessons learned from the experience of past nuclear accidents and develop recommendations for preparedness and health surveillance of populations affected by a nuclear accident. Using a toolkit approach, Tsuda et al. recently published a critical review of the article by Cléro et al. derived from the SHAMISEN project on thyroid cancer screening after nuclear accident. We address the main points of criticism of our publication on the SHAMISEN European project. We disagree with some of the arguments and criticisms mentioned by Tsuda et al. We continue to support the conclusions and recommendations of the SHAMISEN consortium, including the recommendation not to launch a mass thyroid cancer screening after a nuclear accident, but rather to make it available (with appropriate information counselling) to those who request it.