Structural differences in the diaphragm of patients following controlled vs assisted and spontaneous mechanical ventilation

Marin Corral, Judith; Dot Jordana, Irene, 1982-; Boguñá, Marián; Cecchini Rosell, Lluís; Zapatero, Ana; Gracia Arnillas, María Pilar; Pascual Guàrdia, Sergi, 1979-; Vilà Vilardell, Clara; Castellví, A.; Pérez-Terán, Purificación; Gea Guiral, Joaquim; Masclans Enviz, Joan Ramon

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05566-5

Structural differences in the diaphragm of patients following controlled vs assisted and spontaneous mechanical ventilation

Citation

Marin-Corral J, Dot I, Boguña M, Cecchini L, Zapatero A, Gracia MP et al. Structural differences in the diaphragm of patients following controlled vs assisted and spontaneous mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(4):488-500. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05566-5

Abstract

Purpose: Ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction or damage (VIDD) is highly prevalent in patients under mechanical ventilation (MV), but its analysis is limited by the difficulty of obtaining histological samples. In this study we compared diaphragm histological characteristics in Maastricht III (MSIII) and brain-dead (BD) organ donors and in control subjects undergoing thoracic surgery (CTL) after a period of either controlled or spontaneous MV (CMV or SMV). Methods: In this prospective study, biopsies were obtained from diaphragm and quadriceps. Demographic variables, comorbidities, severity on admission, treatment, and ventilatory variables were evaluated. Immunohistochemical analysis (fiber size and type percentages) and quantification of abnormal fibers (a surrogate of muscle damage) were performed. Results: Muscle samples were obtained from 35 patients. MSIII (n = 16) had more hours on MV (either CMV or SMV) than BD (n = 14) and also spent more hours and a greater percentage of time with diaphragm stimuli (time in assisted and spontaneous modalities). Cross-sectional area (CSA) was significantly reduced in the diaphragm and quadriceps in both groups in comparison with CTL (n = 5). Quadriceps CSA was significantly decreased in MSIII compared to BD but there were no differences in the diaphragm CSA between the two groups. Those MSIII who spent 100 h or more without diaphragm stimuli presented reduced diaphragm CSA without changes in their quadriceps CSA. The proportion of internal nuclei in MSIII diaphragms tended to be higher than in BD diaphragms, and their proportion of lipofuscin deposits tended to be lower, though there were no differences in the quadriceps fiber evaluation. Conclusions: This study provides the first evidence in humans regarding the effects of different modes of MV (controlled, assisted, and spontaneous) on diaphragm myofiber damage, and shows that diaphragm inactivity during mechanical ventilation is associated with the development of VIDD.