Breast cancer detection risk in screening mammography after a false-positive result

dc.contributor.authorCastells, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorRomán, Marta
dc.contributor.authorRomero, Anabel
dc.contributor.authorBlanch, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorZubizarreta, Raquel
dc.contributor.authorAscunce, Nieves
dc.contributor.authorSalas, Dolores
dc.contributor.authorBurón, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorSala i Serra, Maria
dc.contributor.authorCumulative False Positive Risk Group
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-13T08:51:55Z
dc.date.available2025-01-13T08:51:55Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractBackground: False-positives are a major concern in breast cancer screening. However, false-positives have been little evaluated as a prognostic factor for cancer detection. Our aim was to evaluate the association of false-positive results with the cancer detection risk in subsequent screening participations over a 17-year period. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 762,506 women aged 45-69 years, with at least two screening participations, who underwent 2,594,146 screening mammograms from 1990 to 2006. Multilevel discrete-time hazard models were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (OR) of breast cancer detection in subsequent screening participations in women with false-positive results. Results: False-positives involving a fine-needle aspiration cytology or a biopsy had a higher cancer detection risk than those involving additional imaging procedures alone (OR = 2.69; 95%CI: 2.28-3.16 and OR = 1.81; 95%CI: 1.70-1.94, respectively). The risk of cancer detection increased substantially if women with cytology or biopsy had a familial history of breast cancer (OR = 4.64; 95%CI: 3.23-6.66). Other factors associated with an increased cancer detection risk were age 65-69 years (OR = 1.84; 95%CI: 1.67-2.03), non-attendance at the previous screening invitation (OR = 1.26; 95%CI: 1.11-1.43), and having undergone a previous benign biopsy outside the screening program (OR = 1.24; 95%CI: 1.13-1.35). Conclusion: Women with a false-positive test have an increased risk of cancer detection in subsequent screening participations, especially those with a false-positive result involving cytology or biopsy. Understanding the factors behind this association could provide valuable information to increase the effectiveness of breast cancer screening.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationCastells X, Román M, Romero A, Blanch J, Zubizarreta R, Ascunce N, et al. Breast cancer detection risk in screening mammography after a false-positive result. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;37(1):85-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.10.004
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2012.10.004
dc.identifier.issn1877-7821
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/69082
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofCancer Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;37(1):85-90
dc.rights© 2012 Elsevier Ltd. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.keywordBreast cancer screening
dc.subject.keywordCancer detection
dc.subject.keywordFalse-positive
dc.subject.keywordRisk factors
dc.titleBreast cancer detection risk in screening mammography after a false-positive result
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Castells_ce_brea.pdf
Size:
332.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License

Rights