Wh-movement, islands, and resumption in L1 and L2 Spanish: is (un)grammaticality the relevant property?

Perpiñán, Sílvia

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00395

Wh-movement, islands, and resumption in L1 and L2 Spanish: is (un)grammaticality the relevant property?

License

Citation

Perpiñán S. Wh-movement, islands, and resumption in L1 and L2 Spanish: is (un)grammaticality the relevant property? Front Psychol. 2020;11:395. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00395

Abstract

This study reflects on the meaning of the results of a self-paced grammaticality judgment task that tested island configurations (with gaps and resumptive pronouns) in L1 and L2 speakers of Spanish. Results indicated that resumptive pronouns do not rescue extractions from islands, as traditionally assumed in grammatical theory, and propose that islands are essentially an interpretative or processing matter, and not only a grammatical one, as in Kluender (1998). This study further challenges the L2 studies that proposed that L2 learners are fundamentally different from native speakers because they usually fail to reject island configurations, and shows that L2 learners are sensitive to the same processing and interpretative mechanisms that native speakers employ to parse island configurations. Generally speaking, this study proposes that apparent purely syntactic restrictions such as extractions from islands might not depend on their grammatical formation, but on other relevant factors such as plausibility, embedding, and processability, which together with grammatical well-formedness configure a more holistic and useful notion of linguistic acceptability.