Cardiac tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance to predict the absence of intracardiac thrombus in anticoagulated patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation

Zaraket, Fatima; Bas, Deva; Jiménez, Jesús; Casteigt, Benjamin; Benito, Begoña; Martí Almor, Julio; Conejos, Javi; Tizón-Marcos, Helena; Mojón Álvarez, Diana; Vallés Gras, Ermengol

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082101

Cardiac tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance to predict the absence of intracardiac thrombus in anticoagulated patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation

License

Citation

Zaraket F, Bas D, Jimenez J, Casteigt B, Benito B, Martí-Almor J, et al. Cardiac tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance to predict the absence of intracardiac thrombus in anticoagulated patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 8; 11(8): 2101. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11082101.

Abstract

Background: pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) is a standard treatment for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). Uninterrupted anticoagulation for a minimum of 3 weeks before ablation and exclusion of left atrial (LA) thrombus with transesophageal echography (TEE) immediately before or during the procedure minimize peri-procedural risk. We aimed to demonstrate the utility of cardiac tomography (CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to rule out LA thrombus prior to PVI. Methods: patients undergoing PVI for recurrent AF were retrospectively evaluated. Only patients that started anticoagulation at least 3 weeks prior to the CT/CMR and subsequently uninterrupted until the ablation procedure were selected. An intracardiac echo (ICE) catheter was used in all patients to evaluate LA thrombus. The results of CT/CMR were compared to ICE imaging. Results: we included 272 consecutive patients averaging 54.5 years (71% male; 30% persistent AF). Average CHA2DS2VASC score was 0.9 ± 0.83 and mean LA diameter was 42 ± 5.7 mm, 111 (41%) patients were on Acenocumarol and 161 (59%) were on direct oral anticoagulants. Anticoagulation was started 227 ± 392 days before the CT/CMR, and 291 ± 416 days before the ablation procedure. CT/CMR diagnosed intracardiac thrombus in two cases, both in the LA appendage. A new CT/CMR revealed resolution of thrombus after six additional months of uninterrupted anticoagulation. No macroscopic thrombus was observed in any patients with ICE (negative predictive value of 100%; p < 0.01). Conclusions: CT and MRI are excellent surrogates to TEE and ICE to rule out intracardiac thrombus in patients adequately anticoagulated prior AF ablation. This is true even for delayed procedures as long as anticoagulation is uninterrupted.