Review of Economic Dynamics, 3, (2000), pp. 247-282
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the realism of mechanisms that implement
social choice functions in the traditional sense. Will agents actually play
the equilibrium assumed by the analysis? As an example, we study the
convergence and stability properties of Sj\"ostr\"om's (1994) mechanism, on
the assumption that boundedly rational players find their way to equilibrium
using monotonic learning dynamics and also with fictitious play. This
mechanism implements most social choice functions in economic environments
using as a solution concept the iterated elimination of weakly dominated
strategies (only one round of deletion of weakly dominated strategies is
needed). There are, however, many sets of Nash equilibria whose payoffs may
be very different from those desired by the social choice function. With
monotonic dynamics we show that many equilibria in all the sets of
equilibria we describe are the limit points of trajectories that have
completely mixed initial conditions. The initial conditions that lead to
these equilibria need not be very close to the limiting point. Furthermore,
even if the dynamics converge to the ``right'' set of equilibria, it still
can converge to quite a poor outcome in welfare terms. With fictitious play,
if the agents have completely mixed prior beliefs, beliefs and play converge
to the outcome the planner wants to implement.
Other authors
Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Departament d'Economia i Empresa