Sickness absence, medical and workplace conditions during pregnancy in a cohort of healthcare workers
Loading...
Date
Document Type
Document Version
License
Citation
Villar Vinuesa R, Serra C, Serra L, Benavides FG. Sickness absence, medical and workplace conditions during pregnancy in a cohort of healthcare workers. Arch Prev Riesgos Labor. 2022 Apr 15;25(2):101-18. DOI: 10.12961/aprl.2022.25.02.03
Abstract
Objetivo: Evaluar la asociación entre trayectorias de ausencia por enfermedad (SA) según diagnóstico y exposición a factores de riesgo laborales durante el embarazo. Métodos: Estudio de cohortes (367 trabajadoras sanitarias embarazadas). Se identificaron trayectorias de ausencia por enfermedad según los diagnósticos más frecuentes mediante análisis de secuencias (2010-2014). La trayectoria 1 incluía SA principalmente por trastornos musculoesqueléticos (58,86%), la 2 por trastornos relacionados con el embarazo (25,07%) y la 3 incluía ausencias por la prestación por riesgo durante el embarazo (POR) y pocas SA (16,08%). La exposición a factores de riesgo laborales fue evaluada por expertos y se analizó la asociación con las trayectorias mediante regresión logística. Los riesgos relativos (RR) y sus intervalos de confianza (IC95%) se ajustaron por edad, contrato y turno. Resultados: La trayectoria 1 se asoció negativamente con la exposición a riesgos de seguridad y ergonómicos (RR=0,56, IC95%=0,35-0,90; RR=0,50, IC95%=0,33-0,77) y con índice de riesgo global más bajo (RR=0,68, IC95%=0,49-0,96). La tercera se asoció a riesgos de seguridad y ergonómicos (RR=2,75, IC 95 %=1,59-4,75; RR=3,64, IC 95 %=2,18-6,06) y con el riesgo más alto (RR=2,69, 95 % IC=1,43-5,01). El personal de enfermería tuvo mayor probabilidad de pertenecer a la trayectoria 3 (RR 5,58, IC95%=2,09-14,95 y RR 5,00, IC95% 2,18-6,06). Conclusiones: Los trastornos musculoesqueléticos y por trastornos relacionados con el embarazo son los grupos diagnósticos de SA más frecuentes. Bajos niveles de exposición a riesgos laborales se relacionaron con ausencias cubiertas principalmente por SA. Las prestaciones sociales parecen utilizarse complementariamente para equilibrar el trabajo y la salud.
Objectives: To assess the association between sickness absence (SA) trajectories by medical diagnoses and exposure to occupational risk factors during pregnancy. Methods: SA trajectories were identified in a cohort of 367 pregnant workers from a healthcare institution (period 2010-2014), based on most frequent diagnosis using sequence analysis. Trajectory 1 included SA episodes due mainly to musculoskeletal disorders (58.86%), trajectory 2 included SA episodes due to pregnancy-related disorders (25.07%) and trajectory 3 included absences mainly covered by pregnancy-related occupational risk benefits (POR) and few SA episodes (16.08%). Exposure to occupational risk factors was assessed by experts and their association with trajectories was analysed using logistic regression. Relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were adjusted for age, type of contract and work shift. Results: Trajectory 1 was negatively associated with exposure to safety and ergonomic risks (RR=0.56, 95%CI=0.35-0.90; RR=0.50, 95%CI=0.33-0.77, respectively) and with the highest global risk index (RR=0.68, 95%CI=0.49-0.96). Trajectory 3 was associated with safety and ergonomic risks (RR=2.75, 95%CI=1.59-4.75; RR=3.64, 95%CI=2.18-6.06, respectively) and with the highest global risk index (RR=2.69, 95%CI=1.43-5.01). Nursing aides and nurses had a higher probability of belonging to trajectory 3 (RR 5.58, 95%CI=2.09-14.95 and RR 5.00, 95%CI 2.18-6.06, respectively). Conclusions: Pregnancy-related and musculoskeletal disorders are the most frequent sickness absence diagnosis during pregnancy. Low levels of occupational risk factors exposure were related to absences from work covered mainly by sickness absence. Current social benefits seem to be used as a complementary way to balance work and health during pregnancy.
Objectives: To assess the association between sickness absence (SA) trajectories by medical diagnoses and exposure to occupational risk factors during pregnancy. Methods: SA trajectories were identified in a cohort of 367 pregnant workers from a healthcare institution (period 2010-2014), based on most frequent diagnosis using sequence analysis. Trajectory 1 included SA episodes due mainly to musculoskeletal disorders (58.86%), trajectory 2 included SA episodes due to pregnancy-related disorders (25.07%) and trajectory 3 included absences mainly covered by pregnancy-related occupational risk benefits (POR) and few SA episodes (16.08%). Exposure to occupational risk factors was assessed by experts and their association with trajectories was analysed using logistic regression. Relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were adjusted for age, type of contract and work shift. Results: Trajectory 1 was negatively associated with exposure to safety and ergonomic risks (RR=0.56, 95%CI=0.35-0.90; RR=0.50, 95%CI=0.33-0.77, respectively) and with the highest global risk index (RR=0.68, 95%CI=0.49-0.96). Trajectory 3 was associated with safety and ergonomic risks (RR=2.75, 95%CI=1.59-4.75; RR=3.64, 95%CI=2.18-6.06, respectively) and with the highest global risk index (RR=2.69, 95%CI=1.43-5.01). Nursing aides and nurses had a higher probability of belonging to trajectory 3 (RR 5.58, 95%CI=2.09-14.95 and RR 5.00, 95%CI 2.18-6.06, respectively). Conclusions: Pregnancy-related and musculoskeletal disorders are the most frequent sickness absence diagnosis during pregnancy. Low levels of occupational risk factors exposure were related to absences from work covered mainly by sickness absence. Current social benefits seem to be used as a complementary way to balance work and health during pregnancy.
Other authors
Description
Collection
Alternative title
Ausencia por enfermedad, condiciones médicas y de trabajo durante el embarazo en una cohorte de profesionales sanitarias
