Echoicity and contrast in Spanish conditionals

Castroviejo, Elena; Mayol, Laia

doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2019-2039

Echoicity and contrast in Spanish conditionals

License

Citation

Castroviejo E, Mayol L. Echoicity and contrast in Spanish conditionals. The Linguistic Review. 2019;36(4):601-35. DOI: 10.1515/tlr-2019-2039

Abstract

This paper is concerned with a conditional construction in Spanish, which we call echoic contrastive conditional, ECC for short. In ECCs, the consequent is entailed, the antecedent echoes the content of a previous assertion, and both antecedent and consequent are marked with a Contrastive Topic. Our goal is to fit these properties in a formal explanation compatible with a simple analysis of conditionals. We claim that ECCs are a subtype of biscuit conditional, in that antecedent and consequent are independent (i.e. do not express a hypothetical relation). Additionally, we assume that pragmatic reasoning has to explain why a conditional is used to express an adversative relation between the two clauses. First, a proposition that has already been proposed to increase the Common Ground is placed in the antecedent of a conditional in which there is no hypothetical relation between p and q. Thus, the addressee needs to reason as to the pragmatic function the speaker wants to achieve. Second, the Contrastive Topic marking signals that both conjuncts are answers to a multiple wh-question, proposed by the speaker as the current Question Under Discussion (QUD). Third, the answer provided by the second conjunct is a stronger argument for the speaker’s communicative goal than the one provided by the first conjunct. The joint occurrence of echoicity, lack of dependence and Contrastive Topic marking leads to an adversative rhetorical relation between the conjuncts.