Geographies of EU dissatisfaction: does spatial segregation between natives and migrants erode the EU project?

Rodon i Casarramona, Antoni; Kent, Jonathan

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2271504

Geographies of EU dissatisfaction: does spatial segregation between natives and migrants erode the EU project?

Citation

Rodon T, Kent J. Geographies of EU dissatisfaction: does spatial segregation between natives and migrants erode the EU project? J Eur Public Policy. 2024;31(6):1675-92. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2271504

Abstract

This article examines whether the spatial segregation of immigrant groups conditions the relationship between the share of migrants and attitudes towards EU integration. Do varying degrees of clustering of migrants in space diminish, mitigate or exacerbate the effect of immigration on EU attitudes? We combine data from the European Social Survey with fine-grain spatial segregation measures captured by the D4I project across four European Union countries. We find that those who live in regions with a greater share of migrants from Eastern Europe have more positive attitudes towards the EU but that this positive influence diminishes in highly segregated areas. The analysis also shows that the effect is primarily driven by the working class. Our findings have important implications as they show that the joint consideration of both the levels and the distribution of migrants in space is crucial to understanding the relationship between immigration and attitudes towards the EU.