Welcome to the UPF Digital Repository

The CUPID (Cultural and Psychosocial Influences on Disability) study: methods of data collection and characteristics of study sample

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Coggon, David
dc.contributor.author Serra, Consol
dc.contributor.author Vargas-Prada Figueroa, Sergio, 1976-
dc.contributor.author Martínez, Miguel
dc.contributor.author Delclòs i Clanchet, Jordi, 1956-
dc.contributor.author Benavides, Fernando G. (Fernando García)
dc.contributor.author Kogevinas, Manolis
dc.date.accessioned 2015-12-14T14:03:20Z
dc.date.available 2015-12-14T14:03:20Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.citation Coggon D, Ntani G, Palmer KT, Felli VE, Harari R, Barrero LH et al. The CUPID (Cultural and Psychosocial Influences on Disability) study: methods of data collection and characteristics of study sample. PLos One. 2012;7(7):e39820. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0039820
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10230/25416
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: The CUPID (Cultural and Psychosocial Influences on Disability) study was established to explore the hypothesis that common musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and associated disability are importantly influenced by culturally determined health beliefs and expectations. This paper describes the methods of data collection and various characteristics of the study sample. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A standardised questionnaire covering musculoskeletal symptoms, disability and potential risk factors, was used to collect information from 47 samples of nurses, office workers, and other (mostly manual) workers in 18 countries from six continents. In addition, local investigators provided data on economic aspects of employment for each occupational group. Participation exceeded 80% in 33 of the 47 occupational groups, and after pre-specified exclusions, analysis was based on 12,426 subjects (92 to 1018 per occupational group). As expected, there was high usage of computer keyboards by office workers, while nurses had the highest prevalence of heavy manual lifting in all but one country. There was substantial heterogeneity between occupational groups in economic and psychosocial aspects of work; three- to five-fold variation in awareness of someone outside work with musculoskeletal pain; and more than ten-fold variation in the prevalence of adverse health beliefs about back and arm pain, and in awareness of terms such as "repetitive strain injury" (RSI). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The large differences in psychosocial risk factors (including knowledge and beliefs about MSDs) between occupational groups should allow the study hypothesis to be addressed effectively.
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation.ispartof PLos One. 2012;7(7):e39820
dc.rights © Coggon et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.subject.other Aparell locomotor -- Malalties
dc.subject.other Malalties professionals -- Epidemiologia
dc.title The CUPID (Cultural and Psychosocial Influences on Disability) study: methods of data collection and characteristics of study sample
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039820
dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

In collaboration with Compliant to Partaking