Cespa, GiovanniCestone, GiacintaUniversitat Pompeu Fabra. Departament d'Economia i Empresa2017-07-262017-07-262002-07-01http://hdl.handle.net/10230/1156We argue that when stakeholder protection is left to the voluntary initiative of managers, concessions to social activists and pressure groups can turn into a self-entrenchment strategy for incumbent CEOs. Stakeholders other than shareholders thus benefit from corporate governance rules putting managers under a tough replacement threat. We show that a minimal amount of formal stakeholder protection, or the introduction of explicit covenants protecting stakeholder rights in the firm charter, may deprive CEOs of the alliance with powerful social activists, thus increasing managerial turnover and shareholder value. These results rationalize a recent trend whereby well-known social activists like Friends of the Earth and active shareholders like CalPERS are showing a growing support for each other s agendas.application/pdfengL'accés als continguts d'aquest document queda condicionat a l'acceptació de les condicions d'ús establertes per la següent llicència Creative CommonsStakeholder activism, managerial entrenchment and the congruence of interests between shareholders and stakeholdersinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPapercorporate governancemanagerial entrenchmentsocial activistssmall shareholdersstakeholder societyFinance and Accountinginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess