Peydró, José-LuisPolo, Andrea, 1983-Sette, Enrico2019-04-122019-04-122020-04http://hdl.handle.net/10230/37100Monetary policy transmission may be impaired if banks rebalance their portfolios towards securities to pursue e.g. risk-shifting or liquidity hoarding. We identify the bank lending and risk-taking channels by exploiting – Italian’s unique – credit and security registers. In crisis times, with softer ECB’s monetary policy conditions, less capitalized banks increase securities over credit supply, with associated firm-level real effects. However, less capitalized banks buy securities with lower yield (haircuts), even within securities with identical regulatory risk weights, thus reaching-for-safety/liquidity. Results are only present in marked-to-market portfolios. The evidence suggests that liquidity and risk-bearing capacity – rather than riskshifting or regulatory arbitrage – are key drivers of banks’ behavior. Differently, in pre-crisis times, securities do not crowd-out loan application granting by less capitalized banks.application/pdfcatinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperMonetary policyEuro area sovereign debt crisisLehman crisisSecuritiesCreditBank capitalReach-for-yieldHeld to maturityAvailable for saleTrading bookHaircutsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess